High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering '11 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23869-7_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Efficient and Scalable Software for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows in Complex Geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning speed‐up, we remark that although the theoretic peak performances (roughly 50 GFlops (depending on the clock frequency) for the i7‐960 and 1345 GFlops for the GTX 480) allow a maximum speed‐up of about 27 for realistic, compute‐intensive (as opposed to memory‐intensive) applications such as the MI computation, the constraints the hardware imposes onto the programmer (e.g., coherence among concurrently running threads) only allow much lower speed‐ups . Our own experiments showed that even numerical NVIDIA code (namely the CUBLAS project), which can be regarded as highly optimized, runs at performances much lower than the theoretical peak performance: 765 GFlops.…”
Section: Algorithmic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning speed‐up, we remark that although the theoretic peak performances (roughly 50 GFlops (depending on the clock frequency) for the i7‐960 and 1345 GFlops for the GTX 480) allow a maximum speed‐up of about 27 for realistic, compute‐intensive (as opposed to memory‐intensive) applications such as the MI computation, the constraints the hardware imposes onto the programmer (e.g., coherence among concurrently running threads) only allow much lower speed‐ups . Our own experiments showed that even numerical NVIDIA code (namely the CUBLAS project), which can be regarded as highly optimized, runs at performances much lower than the theoretical peak performance: 765 GFlops.…”
Section: Algorithmic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%