2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c02126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Efficient Methanol Oxidation Reaction Achieved by Cobalt Doping in Delafossite AgNi1–xCoxO2 Solid Solution

Abstract: Developing highly active and durable non-platinum catalysts for methanol oxidation is of great significance for direct methanol fuel cells. However, their electrocatalytic efficiency is still insufficient mainly due to their poor electrical conductivity and slow reaction kinetics. Herein, a non-Pt electrocatalyst AgNi 0.8 Co 0.2 O 2 with a delafossite structure is facilely constructed via a cation-exchange strategy for the methanol oxidation reaction in alkaline media. The introduction of Co atoms is favorable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ni@3FCCO electrode exhibits the lowest Tafel slopes of 69 mV dec −1 , the lower Tafel slope value indicates that achieving the same current density requires a lower overpotential, which proves that the OER kinetics of the Ni@3FCCO electrode is the fastest. The required overpotential to obtain a current density of 10 mA cm −2 and the Tafel slope of Ni@3FCCO electrode are both superior to or close to some non-noble metal oxide catalysts reported in the literature (Table S2†), such as delafossite oxides, including CuScO 2 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 114 mV dec −1 ), 26 AgCoO 2 ( η 10 = 395 mV), 60 AgNi 0.8 Co 0.2 O 2 ( η 10 = 310 mV), 29 CuFeO 2 (Tafel slope = 49.4 mV dec −1 ), 15 CuCoO 2 ( η 10 = 440 mV, Tafel slope = 92.8 mV dec −1 ), 19 Ca doped CuCoO 2 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 96.5 mV dec −1 ), 30 Ni doped CuCoO 2 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 96.5 mV dec −1 ); 35 or other perovskite electrocatalysts, including LaFeO 3 ( η 10 = 420 mV, Tafel slope = 62 mV dec −1 ), 61 LaNiO 3 ( η 10 = 550 mV, Tafel slope = 148 mV dec −1 ), 62 LaNi 0.85 Mg 0.15 O 3 ( η 10 = 450 mV, Tafel slope = 95 mV dec −1 ), 62 LaNiO 3 ( η 10 = 460 mV, Tafel slope = 96 mV dec −1 ), 63 LaCo 0.30 Rh 0.70 O 3 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 126 mV dec −1 ), 64 and La 1− x Sr x CoO 3− δ ( η 10 = 326 mV, Tafel slope = 70.8 mV dec −1 ). 65…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ni@3FCCO electrode exhibits the lowest Tafel slopes of 69 mV dec −1 , the lower Tafel slope value indicates that achieving the same current density requires a lower overpotential, which proves that the OER kinetics of the Ni@3FCCO electrode is the fastest. The required overpotential to obtain a current density of 10 mA cm −2 and the Tafel slope of Ni@3FCCO electrode are both superior to or close to some non-noble metal oxide catalysts reported in the literature (Table S2†), such as delafossite oxides, including CuScO 2 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 114 mV dec −1 ), 26 AgCoO 2 ( η 10 = 395 mV), 60 AgNi 0.8 Co 0.2 O 2 ( η 10 = 310 mV), 29 CuFeO 2 (Tafel slope = 49.4 mV dec −1 ), 15 CuCoO 2 ( η 10 = 440 mV, Tafel slope = 92.8 mV dec −1 ), 19 Ca doped CuCoO 2 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 96.5 mV dec −1 ), 30 Ni doped CuCoO 2 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 96.5 mV dec −1 ); 35 or other perovskite electrocatalysts, including LaFeO 3 ( η 10 = 420 mV, Tafel slope = 62 mV dec −1 ), 61 LaNiO 3 ( η 10 = 550 mV, Tafel slope = 148 mV dec −1 ), 62 LaNi 0.85 Mg 0.15 O 3 ( η 10 = 450 mV, Tafel slope = 95 mV dec −1 ), 62 LaNiO 3 ( η 10 = 460 mV, Tafel slope = 96 mV dec −1 ), 63 LaCo 0.30 Rh 0.70 O 3 ( η 10 = 470 mV, Tafel slope = 126 mV dec −1 ), 64 and La 1− x Sr x CoO 3− δ ( η 10 = 326 mV, Tafel slope = 70.8 mV dec −1 ). 65…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In practice, the effectiveness of this concept has been well demonstrated in some recent reports. For example, Zhang et al 29 introduced the Co element into delafossite AgNiO 2 which not only promoted the formation of oxygen vacancies, but also improved the catalytic activity of the catalyst ( η 10 = 310 mV). Du et al 30 introduced the Ca element in CuCoO 2 which reduced the grain size and increased the specific surface area, thereby increasing the electrocatalytically active area and significantly increasing the OER catalytic performance ( η 10 = 470 mV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CV traces in an alkaline solution without methanol in Figure a show almost no significant peak in the case of pristine CeO 2 and a prominent anodic peak at 1.43 V versus RHE and a counter cathodic peak at 1.36 V versus RHE in the doped materials. The anodic peak may correspond to the formation of oxyhydroxide (–OOH) species associated with the oxidation of higher valency Ni, while the counter cathodic peak might be associated with the corresponding reduction process of Ni–OOH, suggesting a redox Ni 2+ /Ni 3+ process in the experimental potential window. ,, Formation of a thicker layer of –OOH with Ni 3+ was further supported when the corresponding peak current density increased gradually with the increase in the scan rate from 10 to 100 mVs –1 (Figure S5) over the doped materials. It was interesting to observe that the surface concentration of –OOH species was higher in Ce 0.95 Ni 0.05 O 2−δ than that in Zr 0.95 Ni 0.05 O 2−δ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Evidently, the ECSA of Co-S-INF was much higher than that of INF-S, which can be attributed to its plentiful catalytic sites by introducing the Co sulfide and nano-sheet microstructure. 47 Co-S-INF undergoes a CP test toward MOR in 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M methanol mixed solution at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 for 27 h (Fig. 4h), manifesting its good stability toward MOR.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 98%