2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.31.018671
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient multiplex editing: One-shot generation of 8xNicotiana benthamianaand 12x Arabidopsis mutants

Abstract: SummaryGenome editing by RNA-guided nucleases in model species is still hampered by low efficiencies, and isolation of transgene-free individuals often requires tedious PCR screening. Here, we present a toolkit that mitigates these drawbacks for Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis thaliana. The toolkit is based on an intron-optimized SpCas9-coding gene (zCas9i), which conveys dramatically enhanced editing efficiencies. The zCas9i gene is combined with remaining components of the genome editing system in reci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, chromatin confirmation may significantly affect the accessibility of target sites and not be considered in sgRNA designing tools [40]. Thirdly, a recent report indicated Cas9 availability as one of the limiting factors in multiplexing studies [41]. Several sgRNAs were expressed simultaneously in the present work, and thus it is possible that gRNA activities were compromised due to increased competition for SpCas9 binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Secondly, chromatin confirmation may significantly affect the accessibility of target sites and not be considered in sgRNA designing tools [40]. Thirdly, a recent report indicated Cas9 availability as one of the limiting factors in multiplexing studies [41]. Several sgRNAs were expressed simultaneously in the present work, and thus it is possible that gRNA activities were compromised due to increased competition for SpCas9 binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…; Gantner et al, 2019), using previously described target sites / sgRNAs for NRG1 editing (Qi et al, 2018). Different versions of pDGE vectors (Ordon et al, 2017; Ordon et al, 2019; Barthel et al, 2020) were used to generate dm2 and Nbnrg1 mutant lines by Sp Cas9. Respective target sites are provided in Figures S2 (Arabidopsis lines) and S3 ( Nbnrg1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All authors approved the final version. (a) Scheme of pDGE492 used for generation of Nb bak1 mutant plants; based on pDGE463 (Stuttmann et al, 2021). Guide RNAs were expressed under control of a tomato U3 promoter fragment (Stuttmann et al, 2021).…”
Section: Author Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Scheme of pDGE492 used for generation of Nb bak1 mutant plants; based on pDGE463 (Stuttmann et al, 2021). Guide RNAs were expressed under control of a tomato U3 promoter fragment (Stuttmann et al, 2021). Target sites are depicted, color code corresponds to panel b.…”
Section: Author Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%