2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.wri.2014.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient removal of basic blue 41 with nanoporous silica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most conventional adsorption systems use activated carbon despite its high production costs and regeneration difficulty [14]. Recently, many low-cost adsorbents have been investigated in the removal of dyes such as agricultural wastes [15], clays [16], chitosan [17], silica [18], kaolinite [19], perlite [20], sepiolite [21], montmorillonite [22] and some natural biosorbents [23]. However, these materials generally have low adsorption capacities, and hence, a large adsorbent dosage is required to achieve a low dye concentration in the treated effluents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most conventional adsorption systems use activated carbon despite its high production costs and regeneration difficulty [14]. Recently, many low-cost adsorbents have been investigated in the removal of dyes such as agricultural wastes [15], clays [16], chitosan [17], silica [18], kaolinite [19], perlite [20], sepiolite [21], montmorillonite [22] and some natural biosorbents [23]. However, these materials generally have low adsorption capacities, and hence, a large adsorbent dosage is required to achieve a low dye concentration in the treated effluents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activated carbon is regarded as an effective but expensive adsorbent due to its high costs of manufacturing and regeneration [3]. In addition to activated carbon, some adsorbents including agricultural wastes [4,5], lignite [6], natural phosphate [7], chitosan [8], silica [9], kaolinite [10], hydroxyapatite [11,12], perlite [13], sepiolite [14], montmorillonite [15] and some natural biosorbents have also been reported [16,17]. However, studies in this field have not produced materials which meet all demands of adsorption activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the adsorption capacities of other adsorbents for BB41 (Table 4), the adsorption capacity of MW-g-C was found to be better than the most other adsorbents reported in the literature [36][37][38][39] . The higher capacity of MW-g-C is due to the high specific surface area and many pores on adsorbent for dye removal from solution.…”
Section: Isotherm Studiesmentioning
confidence: 73%