2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient solid and solid-shell finite elements with mixed strain–displacement assumptions specifically set up for explicit dynamic simulations using symbolic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this example, the response of the developed CPE and other element formulations under bending deformation mode is tested [Mattern et al (2015)]. To this end, a cube with an edge length of L = 1.0 [m] is considered, which is subjected to one set of four forces on the nodes of the surface X 1 = 0 causing a bending moment about the positive direction e 3 and another set of four forces on the nodes of the surface X 1 = L causing a bending moment about the negative direction e 3 (see Fig.…”
Section: Cube Under Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this example, the response of the developed CPE and other element formulations under bending deformation mode is tested [Mattern et al (2015)]. To this end, a cube with an edge length of L = 1.0 [m] is considered, which is subjected to one set of four forces on the nodes of the surface X 1 = 0 causing a bending moment about the positive direction e 3 and another set of four forces on the nodes of the surface X 1 = L causing a bending moment about the negative direction e 3 (see Fig.…”
Section: Cube Under Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underdevelopment of solid-shell elements in the field of sheet metal forming may result from the technology adopted in the element formulation. As claimed in [17], there are only a few contributions using EAS in combination with explicit time integration. The EAS is based on the introduction of additional degrees of freedom at the element level, which can be condensed using local equation calculation and leads to exactly accurate element formulations in the context of implicit time integration methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the isogeometric solid‐shell element formulations proposed in the literature do not consider dynamic problems or the implications of using explicit time integration. However, numerous recently published contributions show a great interest in using solid‐shell elements in explicit dynamic simulations, eg, many formulations have been proposed in the context of classical finite elements . Furthermore, explicit metal forming simulations with solid‐shell elements were demonstrated in the works of Li et al and Xu et al Traditionally, bilinearly interpolated shell elements have dominated explicit analyses because using higher‐order shape functions (which are Lagrange polynomials) reduces the stable time‐step size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%