1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00037728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficlent plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of Indian field cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Abstract: Three Indian cultivars of L. esculentum were assessed for shoot regeneration from protoplast-derived calli. Consistent yields of viable protoplasts (> 9.0 x 106 g f.wt. -1) were obtained from leaflets of 14 days old cultured shoots. Protoplast viability (88-94%) and plating efficiency (55-70%) were recorded for the three cultivars. Up to 71% of the protoplast-derived tissues regenerated shoots.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the callus tissue was not organogenic. This confirmed the existing differences in the morphogenetic potential observed among genotypes, as previously discussed (Tan et al, 1987;Patil et al, 1994).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the callus tissue was not organogenic. This confirmed the existing differences in the morphogenetic potential observed among genotypes, as previously discussed (Tan et al, 1987;Patil et al, 1994).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Callus was established from explants of young leaves of LeGUS20 on Murashige and Skoog medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962), containing 0.8% agar, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2 mg mL 21 ), 6-benzylaminopurine (0.5 mg mL 21 ), and kanamycin (80 mg mL 21 ) at 26°C under low light (150 mmol m 22 s 21 ) for 16 h light and an 8-h dark photoperiod, and subcultured at intervals of 2 to 3 weeks. Tomato cell suspension cultures were initiated from callus, as described by Patil et al (1994), in the same medium (as callus) but lacking agar and kanamycin. It was maintained by dilution (1:5) every 2 weeks and incubated at 25°C and with shaking at 120 rpm in the dark.…”
Section: Plasmid Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regeneration of putative shoot buds from other transformation treatments was 19.92%-31.5% (data not shown). Patil et al (1994) found plant age and explant pre-conditioning period to be significant factors that influenced their tomato transformation experiments. The enhanced transformation rate because of preconditioning of explants was attributable to exposure of additional surface area as a result of plant cell division for integration of T-DNA from Agrobacterium into plant genome and accumulation of phenolic substances that activate virulence genes in A. tumefaciens (Lipp Joao and Brown 1993).…”
Section: Transformationmentioning
confidence: 96%