2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12088-011-0173-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Expressed Recombinant SEB for Antibody Production and Development of Immunodetection System

Abstract: Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) are the second most common causal agents of food poisoning throughout the world. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) is one of the most potent and a listed biological warfare agent. Therefore, its quick, accurate and sensitive detection is of paramount importance. But availability of sensitive and specific antibodies against SEB is the major bottleneck in the development of an immunodetection system. Therefore, in the present study seb gene was cloned and expressed in a heterol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, numerous reports have been published in the recent past for detection and quantification of SEs in food, most of them are using methodologies which require costly equipment and sophisticated laboratory set up. Several assays reported in recent past include, a double-antibody sandwich ELISA [10] with sensitivity of 32 and 64 pg ml -1 SEA in buffer and milk respectively; a monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA [11] with sensitivity of 0.0282 ng ml -1 SEA; hydrogelbased microarray biochips [14] with detection limit of 0.5 ng ml -1 SEA in milk; a sandwich ELISA [15] for staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) with the sensitivity of 0.25-0.45 ng ml -1 in different foods. Several kits for detection and quantification of classical SEs are also available commercially viz., RIDASCREEN (R-Biopharm GmbH, Germany), Transia (Transia-Diffchamb S.A. Lyon, France), VIDAS Staph enterotoxin 2 (SET2) and TECRA (3M Science, USA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, numerous reports have been published in the recent past for detection and quantification of SEs in food, most of them are using methodologies which require costly equipment and sophisticated laboratory set up. Several assays reported in recent past include, a double-antibody sandwich ELISA [10] with sensitivity of 32 and 64 pg ml -1 SEA in buffer and milk respectively; a monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA [11] with sensitivity of 0.0282 ng ml -1 SEA; hydrogelbased microarray biochips [14] with detection limit of 0.5 ng ml -1 SEA in milk; a sandwich ELISA [15] for staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) with the sensitivity of 0.25-0.45 ng ml -1 in different foods. Several kits for detection and quantification of classical SEs are also available commercially viz., RIDASCREEN (R-Biopharm GmbH, Germany), Transia (Transia-Diffchamb S.A. Lyon, France), VIDAS Staph enterotoxin 2 (SET2) and TECRA (3M Science, USA).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the removal of the normal cells at 4°C with a low-speed centrifugation step (1,000 rpm, 30 min), the remaining supernatant (1,000 rpm, 4°C, 30 min) containing ruptured cells was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min. The sediment (15,000 rpm, 4°C, 30 min) obtained was suspended in 20 mL of 0.5 % sodium lauryl sarkosinate (SLS, Yi Ji Industrial Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China) aqueous solution, and the suspension was gently stirred at 25°C for 30 min to solubilize the inner membrane proteins [12]. The suspension solution was then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min and the sediment collected.…”
Section: Methods Threementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most works related to CDSS deal with diagnosis decision support [2, 3], predicting patient condition [48], or determining drug interaction [9], data-driven CDSS for therapy decision support are rare to date. This fact can be partially attributed to traditional data-mining and machine-learning techniques, which have limitations in case of missing and inhomogeneous data and often show an undesired black-box behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%