2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.102830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly microporous carbons from olive tree pruning: Optimization of chemical activation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of pressure in carbon dioxide activation in the study presented proved also to be more effective in microporosity development than a combined chemical (KOH) and physical activation (H 2 O–CO 2 ) of olive kernels at 800–900 °C, which resulted in 50–70%of microporosity content [17]. The considerable share of micropores, and in particular, the rise in the amount of supermicropores therefore makes carbonization pressure a parameter of interest when production of materials for various new applications, including double-layer electric capacitors, is concerned [20]. The relatively high share of ultramicropores reported for materials developed under pressurized conditions may be considered advantageous in the potential applications of carbon materials for CO 2 capture [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of pressure in carbon dioxide activation in the study presented proved also to be more effective in microporosity development than a combined chemical (KOH) and physical activation (H 2 O–CO 2 ) of olive kernels at 800–900 °C, which resulted in 50–70%of microporosity content [17]. The considerable share of micropores, and in particular, the rise in the amount of supermicropores therefore makes carbonization pressure a parameter of interest when production of materials for various new applications, including double-layer electric capacitors, is concerned [20]. The relatively high share of ultramicropores reported for materials developed under pressurized conditions may be considered advantageous in the potential applications of carbon materials for CO 2 capture [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various research studies examining the application of olive stones [14,15,16,17,18] and, less extensively, of olive tree pruning residues [19,20] or mill waste [21,22,23,24,25,26] as activated carbon precursors are available in the literature, reporting their physical and chemical treatment effects and applicability in CO 2 , NO 2 , CH 4 , and gasoline vapors capture [27,28,29,30,31,32], as well as for dyes and heavy metals removal from aqueous solutions [21,24,25,26]. The activation of a raw precursor usually involves chemical treatment with acidic and/or alkali agents, like H 2 SO 4 [31], H 3 PO 4 [19,21,23,30,31], or KOH [20,23,31], followed by carbonization under inert gas atmosphere at an increased temperature, typically of 350–800 °C. In some works, carbon dioxide and steam activation of carbonized olive stones are reported [15,16,17,18,28,32,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation suggests that KOH as an activating agent is more effective than H 3 PO 4 . Moreover, KOH is considered to be less toxic to the environment in comparison to ZnCl 2 or H 3 PO 4 , making it a reliable choice . Lin et al observed that soybean-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbon as an ORR electrocatalyst demonstrated a current density of 5.09 mA cm –2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore characteristics of activated carbon are determined by the activation process, precursor, and carbonization process, in that order [18], and the activation methods can be classified as physical or chemical [18][19][20]. Of these two methods, chemical activation can produce activated carbon with a micropore-rich pore structure and a high specific surface area [19,20] but at high economic cost. On the other hand, compared to chemical activation, physical activation produces activated carbon with a relatively low specific surface area [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%