“…The volumetric processing efficiency, that is, the sp 3 into sp 2 phase conversion, followed by a subtractive sp 2 fraction removal, remains low for all pulse widths and the lengths of the laser pulse being used, as the thermal diffusion is primarily limited to the focal volume . Processing diamond above its graphitization threshold with ns and/or ps pulses is associated with a higher volume/mass removal but also with a significant and unavoidable formation of HAZ as longer pulses generate plasma plumes of higher ion density and electron temperature. , fs pulses and, in particular, the sub-50 fs pulses are able to deliver a fluence well above diamond’s graphitization threshold (0.3 J/cm 2 ) at or near the ablation threshold (∼3.0–4.0 J/cm 2 ) , and, notionally, without any thermal damage. Simulations suggest that under ns or longer laser pulse durations, graphitization propagates vertically, affecting the bulk of the focal volume, leading to the formation of largely amorphous (a) sp 3 :sp 2 interfaces following the laser treatment. , By contrast, with fs laser pulses, graphitization of diamond occurs fully layer by layer in a pseudo “peel off” process, resulting in the formation of a clean diamond surface after the ablation, which is highly desirable for applied applications.…”