“…The advent of DNA‐based molecular tools for the identification of complex multitaxa samples, that is metabarcoding, has greatly renewed the interest in dietary studies, particularly due to the high taxonomic resolution offered by this approach (e.g., De Barba et al., ; Kartzinel & Pringle, ; Lopes et al., ). This has been especially relevant to species whose diet is particularly difficult to study, either due to their secretive behaviour (e.g., Shehzad et al., ; Soininen et al., ) or due to difficulties to identify prey in dietary remains such as stomach contents, regurgitates and scats (e.g., Arrizabalaga‐Escudero et al., ; Kaunisto, Roslin, Sääksjärvi, & Vesterinen, ; Mollot et al., ). However, despite its increasingly widespread use, uncertainties and potential biases associated with the quantification of diets based on metabarcoding are still not well understood, requiring a detailed enquiry on how results are affected by different methodological options (Alberdi, Aizpurua, Gilbert, & Bohmann, ; Nielsen et al., ).…”