2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00200-010-0124-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly parallel modular multiplication in the residue number system using sum of residues reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The factor (κ) is a function of γ i , not a constant. Therefore the value of V -which is actually the output of SOR algorithm introduced in [19,20] -is not presenting the true reduction of Z p . In fact:…”
Section: Improved Sum Of Residues (Sor) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The factor (κ) is a function of γ i , not a constant. Therefore the value of V -which is actually the output of SOR algorithm introduced in [19,20] -is not presenting the true reduction of Z p . In fact:…”
Section: Improved Sum Of Residues (Sor) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modular reduction based on the sum of residues (SOR) algorithm was first presented by Phillips et al [19] in 2010. The SOR algorithm hardware implementation was proposed later in [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, divisions and modular reductions are complex and costly operations in RNS. Efficient RNS modular reduction and RNS modular multiplication methods have been proposed in [27,19,1,26] RNS modular multiplication for RSA was studied in [27,19,1]. Full RSA in RNS implementations can be found in [23,2,21].…”
Section: Notations and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modular multiplication, one of the most important arithmetic operation in asymmetric cryptography, is significantly more costly than a simple multiplication. Thus, many algorithms and optimizations have been proposed for RNS modular multiplication, see [26,1,18,2,14,24,12,9,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%