2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly porous monolith/TiO 2 supported Cu, Cu-Ni, Ru, and Pt catalysts in methanol steam reforming process for H 2 generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cu-Ni/ZrO 2 system exhibited the highest catalytic activity at lower reaction temperatures compare to the investigated monometallic catalysts. Tahay et al [12] investigated Cu, Cu-Ni, Ru, and Pt catalysts supported on TiO 2 /monolith used in H 2 generation in SRM reaction. The BET measurement showed that the Specific Surface Area (SSA) of the catalysts increased by the co-impregnation of Ni and Cu which resulted in improvement of the methanol conversion value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cu-Ni/ZrO 2 system exhibited the highest catalytic activity at lower reaction temperatures compare to the investigated monometallic catalysts. Tahay et al [12] investigated Cu, Cu-Ni, Ru, and Pt catalysts supported on TiO 2 /monolith used in H 2 generation in SRM reaction. The BET measurement showed that the Specific Surface Area (SSA) of the catalysts increased by the co-impregnation of Ni and Cu which resulted in improvement of the methanol conversion value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Cu-catalyst suffers from some serious drawbacks such as pyrophoricity and catalyst sintering [5][6][7]. To overcome the drawbacks of Cu catalyst, numerous alternative materials have been examined, including noble metal catalysts [8][9][10], Ni-Cu alloy-based catalysts [11][12][13], and Ni-based catalysts [7,[14][15][16]. On one hand, noble metals (Pd, Pt) are known to be the most active catalysts for MSR [8][9][10], but the high prices limit their large-scale industrial applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional reactor for the MSR process is a fixed‐bed reactor, but fixed‐bed reactors have some disadvantages, including a pressure drop problem, resistance to mass transfer, and inappropriate flow distribution . Some features of micro‐reactors include parameters such as smaller size and weight of equipment, high mass and heat transfer rates, lower pressure‐drop loss, stability in terms of structure and heat, and precise control of reaction conditions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, since the distribution of the catalyst on the monolith reactor is more uniform, the interaction of the catalyst with feed increases to a great extent; consequently, better performance of the MSR process can be achieved . Conversely, in a fixed‐bed reactor, most of the catalyst remains practically unusable due to the inappropriate mass transfer process, and most importantly a better dispersion of the catalyst on the monolithic reactor decreases the amount of coke nucleation and raises the catalyst stability …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%