1998
DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199812001-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Precise Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Bone Density, Loss of Bone Density and Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides some support for the hypothesis proposed by other authors [26,3] that persons with osteoporosis can be classed into "fast" and "slow" bone losers. Dambacher et al [26] proposed this distinction for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and identified trabecular BMD as an appropriate parameter to distinguish between the two subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This provides some support for the hypothesis proposed by other authors [26,3] that persons with osteoporosis can be classed into "fast" and "slow" bone losers. Dambacher et al [26] proposed this distinction for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and identified trabecular BMD as an appropriate parameter to distinguish between the two subgroups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This provides some support for the hypothesis proposed by other authors [26,3] that persons with osteoporosis can be classed into "fast" and "slow" bone losers. Dambacher et al [26] proposed this distinction for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and identified trabecular BMD as an appropriate parameter to distinguish between the two subgroups. deBruin et al [3] suggested an equivalent pattern in patients with disuse osteoporosis as a result of SCI, based on their results from a longitudinal pQCT study in ten SCI patients involving an initial scan in the acute phase and a repeat scan at around 3 years post-injury.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a mixed population of normal individuals and patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis, it has been possible to differentiate between fast and slow bone loser within a few months. 26 From the results of this study, it can be hypothesized that there are 'fast loser' and 'slow loser' individuals in a newly injured SCI population as well. Further research should substantiate this assumption and should determine the factors responsible for these differences in bone parameter development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…18 This study showed that pQCT can identify those patients with the most severe disuse-related bone loss, similar to the pQCT-based stratification into slow-or fast-progressing bone loss suggested previously for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. 19 Trabecular BMD measured using pQCT has been shown to be the parameter that best discriminates between individuals who do or do not sustain fractures after SCI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%