The physical properties and electrochemical performances were systematically compared among a quaternary ammonium cationbased room-temperature ionic liquid electrolyte ͑ILE͒, a solid polymer electrolyte ͑SPE͒, and a conventional organic liquid electrolyte ͑OLE͒. The ionic conductivity, an interface impedance at the Li/electrolyte, and the activation energy at the interface were in the order of OLE Ͼ ILE Ͼ SPE. Cells using ILE and SPE exhibited sufficiently high discharge capacities of approximately 160 mAh g −1 at the 100th cycle using LiFePO 4 cathode. The required operation temperatures at a rate of 1C discharge, for which the discharge capacity at 1C was Ͼ90% of that obtained at C/8, were 363 K using SPE and 333 K using ILE. A large-scale lithium secondary battery is important for use with stationary dispersed power source.1 However, innovative and safe materials are required for further improvement of the safety of such large-scale battery systems. Lithium iron phosphate, LiFePO 4 , is an appropriate cathode material for use in large-scale batteries for the following reasons ͑i͒ it has better safety because of the strong covalent bonding of PO 4 , ͑ii͒ it has the potential to be a lower cost cathode material that uses iron, and ͑iii͒ it yields lower operation voltage than a layered oxide such as LiCoO 2 which is an important issue for the safe and long life battery design. The cycle and rate properties of LiFePO 4 have been improved by such methods as carbon coating, partial metal substitution at the iron site, and the control of the particle size.3-5 On the other hand, the selection of a suitable nonflammable electrolyte is another important issue for realizing a safe battery system. Here, we selected two types of electrolyte, an ethylene oxide-based solid polymer electrolyte ͑SPE͒ and a room-temperature ionic liquid electrolyte ͑ILE͒.6,7 Both electrolytes have been separately investigated in terms of the improvement of various characteristics, for example, improvement of the ionic conductivities and stable interface formation with anode and cathode materials etc. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Although both electrolytes have a potential for the future lithium secondary battery with sufficient safety, a relative comparison of these properties between SPE and ILE has not been reported. Thus, we prepared a lithium solid polymer battery ͑SPB͒, an ionic liquid battery ͑ILB͒, and a conventional battery with an organic liquid electrolyte ͑OLB͒ using common cathode ͑LiFePO 4 ͒ and anode ͑Li͒ material, and compared the physical properties and electrochemical performance. The systematic characteristics of the ionic conductivity, the impedance at the Li/electrolyte interface, the activation energy at the interface, the charge-discharge cycle performance, and the rate performance were investigated.
ExperimentalMaterials preparation.-The matrix polymer used as the SPE sheet in this study was P͑EO/MEEGE/AGE͒ = 82/18/1.7 ͑Daiso Co., Ltd.͒, which is a copolymer of ethylene oxide ͑EO, main c...