Cost-effective photovoltaic (PV) devices are in urgent demand due to the global energy crisis. Several novel PV systems have been developed for the ''next-generation'' PV technologies. [1][2][3][4][5] One example is conjugated polymer-based PV devices, which have the advantages of solution processability and ease fabrication.[6] The most commonly used structure for such devices is the bulk heterojunction (BHJ) structure, which consists of electrondonating conjugated polymers and electron-acceptors.[6] The most widely used electron acceptor is fullerene, and efficiencies of over 5% have been achieved for fullerene-polythiophene-based devices. [7][8][9] In addition to fullerene and its derivatives, some n-type inorganic materials, such as II-VI compound semiconductors [10][11][12] and metal oxides, [5] have been investigated as the electron acceptor in polymer-based PV devices, due to their relatively high electron mobility, high electron affinity, and good physical and chemical stability. These devices are often referred to as ''hybrid'' solar cells.[5] Hybrid BHJ devices based on polythiophene and CdSe or TiO 2 nanocrystals have been reported to reach efficiencies of 2.6[12] and 1.7%, [13] respectively. In addition to inorganic nanocrystals, nanostructured metal oxide films have also been employed as electron-collecting electrodes in polymer hybrid solar cells, and porous TiO 2 films have been most widely studied.[5] In order to achieve high device performance, porous TiO 2 films with various morphologies, such as mesoporous structure, [14] bicontinuous networks, [15] nanotube array, [16] or nanofibrous networks, [17] were used to fabricate polymer hybrid devices. Efficiencies of these devices are generally less than 1% under simulated solar illumination. Another strategy to improve the TiO 2 film-based device performance is the optimization of device configuration. By inserting a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) layer between the conjugated polymer layer and the metal electrode, a 20-30% increase in device efficiency with a maximum value of 0.4% was obtained under 1 sun.[18] In addition to the optimization of TiO 2 film morphology and device configuration, surface modification of porous TiO 2 film is also an efficient strategy to improve device performance. The chemisorption of carboxylate, phosphonate, or sulfonate on TiO 2 surfaces provided the possibility of surface modification with organic molecules, which were found to improve the interfacial energetics and surface-wetting properties, resulting in improved device performance. [19][20][21][22] Ruthenium complexes containing carboxylic groups have been employed to modify the interface energy offset between TiO 2 and polythiophene, and an efficiency of $0.6% was achieved, which was about twice that for devices without surface modification. [20] Recently, a high efficiency of 1.3% was reported for devices based on ruthenium complexmodified nanoporous TiO 2 films through optimization of TiO 2 film thickness. [22] Although many...