Fluorescence
sensing of oxalate has garnered some attention in the
past two decades as a result of this anion’s prominence and
impact on society. Previous work on oxalate sensors and other divalent
anion sensors has led to the conclusion that the sensors are selective
for the anion under investigation. However, sensor selectivity is
often determined by testing against a relatively small array of “guest”
molecules or analytes and studies often exclude potentially interfering
compounds. For example, studies on oxalate sensors have excluded compounds
such as citrate and urate, which are anions in the biological matrices
where oxalate is measured (
e.g
., urine, blood, and
bacterial lysate). In the present study, we reassessed the selectivity
of a dinuclear copper(II) macrocycle (Cu
2
L) in an eosin
Y displacement assay using biologically relevant anions. Although
previously reported as selective for oxalate, we found greater indicator
displacement (fluorescence response) for urate and oxaloacetate and
a significant response to citrate. These anions are larger than oxalate
and do not appear to fit into the putative binding pocket of Cu
2
L. Consistent with previous reports, Cu
2
L did not
release eosin Y in the presence of several other dicarboxylates, including
adipate, glutarate, malate (except at 10 mM), fumarate, succinate,
or malonate (except at 10 mM), and the monocarboxylate acetate. This
was demonstrated by the failure of the anions to reverse eosin Y quenching
by Cu
2
L. We also assessed, for the first time, other monocarboxylates,
including butyrate, pyruvate, lactate, propionate, and formate. None
of these anions were able to displace eosin Y, indicating no interaction
with Cu
2
L that interfered with the eosin Y binding site.
Single-crystal X-ray crystallography revealed that nonselective binding
of the anions is likely partly caused by readily accessible copper(II)
ions on the external surface of Cu
2
L. In addition, π–π
stacking of urate with the aromatic groups of Cu
2
L cannot
be ruled out as a contributor to binding. We conclude that Cu
2
L is not suitable for oxalate sensing in a biological matrix
unless interfering compounds are selectively removed or masked.