2023
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c03095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Selective Photoconversion of CO2 to CH4 over SnO2/Cs3Bi2Br9 Heterojunctions Assisted by S-Scheme Charge Separation

Peiyu Hu,
Guijie Liang,
Bicheng Zhu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparent from Figure 5b that m/z of CO from 13 C labelled 13 CO 2 gas is 29, while the m/z of CO coming from 12 CO 2 is 28, indicating that the carbon of CO comes from CO 2 gas, therefore validating the reliability of the above photoreduction performance. [ 50 ] On the other hand, the existence of 16 O 18 O and 18 O 2 has confirmed that water oxidation occurred as the other half reaction to consume the photo‐generated holes (Figure 5b). In addition, liquid 1 H NMR results indicate that there is no obvious peak associated with liquid product (Figure S24, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is apparent from Figure 5b that m/z of CO from 13 C labelled 13 CO 2 gas is 29, while the m/z of CO coming from 12 CO 2 is 28, indicating that the carbon of CO comes from CO 2 gas, therefore validating the reliability of the above photoreduction performance. [ 50 ] On the other hand, the existence of 16 O 18 O and 18 O 2 has confirmed that water oxidation occurred as the other half reaction to consume the photo‐generated holes (Figure 5b). In addition, liquid 1 H NMR results indicate that there is no obvious peak associated with liquid product (Figure S24, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The presence of absorption peaks of monodentate carbonate (m-CO 3 2– , 1507, 1484, and 1310 cm –1 ), bidentate carbonate (b-CO 3 2– , 1587 cm –1 ), bicarbonate (HCO 3 – , 1422 and 1354 cm –1 ), and CO 2 – (1612 and 1244 cm –1 ) suggests the chemisorption of CO 2 on the COF/QDs heterojunction (Figure S20). Under light irradiation, new adsorption signals corresponding to *COOH (1705 cm –1 ), *CO (2078 cm –1 ), *CHO (1008 cm –1 ), *CH 2 O (967 cm –1 ), and *CH 3 O (1103 and 1187 cm –1 ) are observed, which are critical intermediates in the formation of CO and CH 4 . During CO 2 photoreduction, the *CO*H intermediate on the catalyst can undergo three processes: the desorption of CO (Pathway I), the release of H from the interface (Pathway II), and continuous protonation to form the *CHO species and generate CH 4 (Pathway III). DFT calculations reveal that the Δ G values for the three pathways are −0.21, – 0.22, and −0.91 eV, respectively (Figure d), providing a reasonable explanation for the production of CO and CH 4 over the COF/QDs heterojunctions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 For example, Xu et al reported an SnO 2 /Cs 3 Bi 2 Br 9 (SC4) S-scheme heterojunction via the electrostatic self-assembly of SnO 2 nanofibers and lead-free Cs 3 Bi 2 Br 9 quantum dots (QDs). 66 In situ XPS under light and dark conditions was performed to determine the charge transfer mechanism (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Methods For Identifying the S-scheme Charge Transfer Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%