2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly sensitive and selective cholesterol biosensor based on direct electron transfer of hemoglobin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All other chemicals were of analytical grade or higher. A stock solution (5.00 × 10 À3 mol/l) of cholesterol was prepared, as described previously (0.0484 g cholesterol in 25 ml water with 1 ml isopropanol and 0.5 ml Triton X-100) (8). Working solutions of cholesterol were freshly prepared by diluting the stock solution with PBS (pH 7.0) containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All other chemicals were of analytical grade or higher. A stock solution (5.00 × 10 À3 mol/l) of cholesterol was prepared, as described previously (0.0484 g cholesterol in 25 ml water with 1 ml isopropanol and 0.5 ml Triton X-100) (8). Working solutions of cholesterol were freshly prepared by diluting the stock solution with PBS (pH 7.0) containing 1% (v/v) Triton X-100.…”
Section: Experimental Materials and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been reported for the determination of cholesterol, including spectrophotometry (3), fluorescent spectrometry (4,5), chemiluminescence (6), high-performance liquid chromatography (7) and electrochemical methods (8)(9)(10)(11). Some of these have certain disadvantages, such as scarce reagents (3,5), expensive equipment (7), poor selectivity or sensitivity (8,9) or excessive operation times (10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition the immobilization of enzymes allows a low consumption of enzyme. The main immobilizing approaches adopted for cholesterol biosensor include electropolymerization entrapment technique [3,6] self assembled monolayers [7,8] lipid bilayer memberane [9] anodic porous alumina [10] graphiteTeflon composite [11] Prussian blue/poly pyrrole composite 12] direct adsorption [13] chitosan film [14] and sol-gel composite film [15]. A short life time, the waste of expensive biocatalyst (ChOx), leaching of enzyme from electrode surfaces, low catalytic activity, low reproducibility of the biosensor fabrication method and needing electron transfer mediator are main disadvantages of the cholesterol biosensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27] Recently, the direct electrochemistry of Hb has been described in some papers and used to develop H2O2 biosensors. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] In addition, a bienzyme channeling glucose sensor based on the co-entrapment of glucose oxidase (GOD) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in the mesopores of SBA-15 has been developed; 40 the detection of glucose has been accomplished via an electrocatalytic reaction with the HRP to the reduction of H2O2 produced from the enzymatic reaction of a GOD-glucose-dissolved oxygen system. Herein, the direct electron transfer (DET) between Hb and electrode resembles a redox mediator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%