2019
DOI: 10.1111/petr.13549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly sensitive chimerism detection in blood is associated with increased risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in childhood leukemia

Abstract: Analysis of chimerism in blood post‐HCT using STR‐PCR is routinely applied in parallel with quantification of MRD to predict relapse of leukemia. RQ‐PCR chimerism is 10‐ to 100‐fold more sensitive, but clinical studies in children are sparse. We analyzed IMC in blood samples following transplantation for acute lymphoblastic or myeloid leukemia in 56 children. IMC was defined as a minimum increase of (a) 0.1% or (b) 0.05% recipient DNA between two samples. The risk of relapse was higher in children with IMC of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another aspect that has raised interest with the use of qPCR is the detection of low levels of recipient DNA in patients that do not subsequently develop relapse. Like other authors [24,30,38], we think that this finding may correlate with the presence of residual healthy recipient hematopoietic cells or cells from non-hematopoietic origin, which would not be replaced by donor-derived cells after HSCT. This is especially relevant in BM samples, for which STR-PCR is known to provide higher sensitivity [39][40][41], but have also shown higher sensitivity when using qPCR [42].…”
Section: Comparison Between Str-pcr and Qpcr: Clinical Aspectssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Another aspect that has raised interest with the use of qPCR is the detection of low levels of recipient DNA in patients that do not subsequently develop relapse. Like other authors [24,30,38], we think that this finding may correlate with the presence of residual healthy recipient hematopoietic cells or cells from non-hematopoietic origin, which would not be replaced by donor-derived cells after HSCT. This is especially relevant in BM samples, for which STR-PCR is known to provide higher sensitivity [39][40][41], but have also shown higher sensitivity when using qPCR [42].…”
Section: Comparison Between Str-pcr and Qpcr: Clinical Aspectssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Analysis of chimerism after SCT is applicable across all leukaemia subtypes but sensitivity is limited to only 1-5%, albeit may be improved with the use of more sensitive qPCR techniques including microchimerism. 61 However, although increasing recipient chimerism is associated with disease recurrence not all cases lead to relapse in contrast to increasing qPCR MRD in PB. While mounting evidence suggest a strong prognostic impact of pre-transplant NPM1 MRD, [62][63][64][65] the predictive value of longitudinal surveillance of NPM1 MRD after SCT is also becoming increasingly apparent.…”
Section: Correlation Between Paired Bm and Pb Qpcr Mrdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the report, the definition of increasing HC (eg, one or two increases), and the size of increase (eg, 0.05%, 0.10% increase compared with the previous sample), the negative and positive predictive values varied. 4,32 Timing of follow-up samples in these studies was lacking. Taken together, the small case series presented here and evidence from qPCR assays that exhibit a similar detection limit as the HTS assay indicate that the HTS assay may allow for prediction of early relapse compared with PCR-CE assays.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%