“…Similarly it is common to locate the photodetector immediately after the interrogation region [i.e. (Berman et al, 2012;Ren et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2015;Nwaboh et al, 2013;Bauer et al, 2014;Huang et al, 2014;Ye et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2013;Mappé et al, 2013;Brumfield et al, 2015;Krzempek et al, 2013;Leen et al, 2013;Rieker et al, 2014;Shemshad, 2015;Triki et al, 2015)]. However, while having a detector as part of the interrogation cell improves tolerance to beam deviation and dispersion due to the larger target area on a photodiode versus a collimating optic, eliminating the photodetector from an interrogation region placed in situ reduces the need for electrical components and cabling, and more importantly for this application, removes the flammability risk by ensuring the remote sensor head is intrinsically safe.…”