2020
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201908462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Stable and Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells with 22.0% Efficiency Based on Inorganic–Organic Dopant‐Free Double Hole Transporting Layers

Abstract: Most of the high performance in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have only been achieved with two organic hole transporting materials: 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,Ndi-p-methoxyphenylamine)-9,9-spirobifluorene (Spiro-OMeTAD) and poly(triarylamine) (PTAA), but their high cost and low stability caused by the hygroscopic dopant greatly hinder the commercialization of PSCs. One effective alternative to address this problem is to utilize inexpensive inorganic hole transporting layer (i-HTL), but obtaining high efficiency via … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, spiro-OMeTAD is still the most popular HTM for high-performing PSCs, but it only works effectively in combination with some additives, for example, 4-tert-butylpyridine (tBP) and bis (trifluoromethane) sulfonimide lithium salt (Li-TFSI) [25]. Dopant-free HTMs such as PEDOT:PSS [poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrene sulfonate] and P3HT [poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl)] have also been developed [26][27][28][29]. Our group also reported a dopant-free P1-based PSCs which achieved a PCE of 18.30% [30].…”
Section: Hole Transporting Materials (Htms) For Pscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, spiro-OMeTAD is still the most popular HTM for high-performing PSCs, but it only works effectively in combination with some additives, for example, 4-tert-butylpyridine (tBP) and bis (trifluoromethane) sulfonimide lithium salt (Li-TFSI) [25]. Dopant-free HTMs such as PEDOT:PSS [poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrene sulfonate] and P3HT [poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl)] have also been developed [26][27][28][29]. Our group also reported a dopant-free P1-based PSCs which achieved a PCE of 18.30% [30].…”
Section: Hole Transporting Materials (Htms) For Pscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3–6 ] Generally, two kinds of structures or regular n−i−p or inverted p−i−n are adopted in PSCs, where n/p and i stand for electron‐/hole‐transporting layer (ETL/HTL) and perovskite, respectively. [ 7,8 ] As for HTL, several materials have been tried, like CuI, [ 9 ] CuSCN, [ 10 ] poly(3,4‐ethylene dioxythiophene): poly (styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), [ 11 ] poly (3‐hexylthiophene) (P3HT), [ 12 ] polytriarylamine (PTAA), [ 13 ] 2,2′,7,7′‐tetrakis [ N , N ‐di (4‐methoxyphenyl) amino]‐9,9′‐spiro‐bifluorene (spiro‐OMeTAD). [ 14 ] Among these HTLs, spiro‐OMeTAD is adopted in most.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d) EIS of CuSCN, DTB, and CuSCN/DTB-based PSCs, inset image shows equivalent fitting circuit. Reproduced with permission [98]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%