2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly turbulent counterflow flames: A laboratory scale benchmark for practical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The configuration has also been proposed as a critical benchmark for combustion LES [7] as well as for moment based methods [8]. The focus of the current paper is on the measurement of velocity statistics inside and between two nozzles in an opposed jet geometry featuring enhanced turbulence generation and follows contributions by Rolon et al [9], Mastorakos et al [10], Kostiuk et al [11], Mounaïm-Rousselle and Gökalp [12], Sardi et al [13], Stan and Johnson [14], Geyer et al [15] and, more recently, Coppola et al [16] presented higher turbulence intensities in a opposed jet geometry using turbulence generators with a blockage of 90%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The configuration has also been proposed as a critical benchmark for combustion LES [7] as well as for moment based methods [8]. The focus of the current paper is on the measurement of velocity statistics inside and between two nozzles in an opposed jet geometry featuring enhanced turbulence generation and follows contributions by Rolon et al [9], Mastorakos et al [10], Kostiuk et al [11], Mounaïm-Rousselle and Gökalp [12], Sardi et al [13], Stan and Johnson [14], Geyer et al [15] and, more recently, Coppola et al [16] presented higher turbulence intensities in a opposed jet geometry using turbulence generators with a blockage of 90%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This simple and compact configuration can easily be simulated as only a small computational domain is required. Turbulent opposed jet burners have been subject to numerous experimental and numerical investigations [4,5,11,14,17,19,20,23,26,29,30] as summarized by Geyer et al [10] and Lindstedt et al [21]. Experimental investigations of velocity and strain rate characteristics of the isothermal flow-field were performed by Korusoy and Whitelaw [19], Kostiuk et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The effect of the fractal turbulence generator was to increase the turbulence Reynolds number by 100% and more (Re t,max = 220) compared to conventional perforated plates, while maintaining nearly isotropic turbulence at the nozzle exit. Coppolla et al [6] have investigated an alternative TOJ geometry with a petal-shaped TGP orifice in conjunction with a large plenum chamber using HWA, PIV and OH-PLIF under isothermal, premixed and non-premixed conditions. With this set-up the experimentalists achieved turbulence Reynolds numbers of more than 1,000 (albeit for the isothermal case), which is well within the range of practical relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%