2020
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hijacking Europe: Counter‐European Strategies and Radical Right Mainstreaming during the Humanitarian Crisis Debate 2015–16*

Abstract: Radical right European contestation is analyzed mainly as claims denouncing European integration. Less focus is put on narratives suggesting how a supposed 'truly European' political process should be and work. This paper explores how radical right actors use such counter-European claims within their competition strategies. Computer-assisted qualitative analysis of communication by Front National, Alternative for Germany and Fidesz during the humanitarian crisis debate 2015-16 demonstrates that radical right c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former case, this trend unfolds especially around the 2015 humanitarian crisis. This is in line with recent case study insights (Pytlas, 2021). By early 2016, parallel to demarcative policy shifts of some conventional parties linked to competence appeals, several radical right actors themselves justified nativist stances not only as what the people want, but also as indispensable to efficaciously ‘manage’ migration, guarantee a tougher hand against constructed cultural threat, as well as end supposed chaos by ‘decisive’ politics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the former case, this trend unfolds especially around the 2015 humanitarian crisis. This is in line with recent case study insights (Pytlas, 2021). By early 2016, parallel to demarcative policy shifts of some conventional parties linked to competence appeals, several radical right actors themselves justified nativist stances not only as what the people want, but also as indispensable to efficaciously ‘manage’ migration, guarantee a tougher hand against constructed cultural threat, as well as end supposed chaos by ‘decisive’ politics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Extra-political expertise might nonetheless be relevant to justify or contest policy between elections (Bertsou and Caramani, 2020). In general, the impact of thin supply (including populism), detrimental when linked to anti-pluralist thick ideas, unfolds also beyond electoral contexts (Art, 2020; Pytlas, 2021). Furthermore, we were specific in testing whether using particular thin contestation messages as auxiliary mobilization tools matter for AEPs’ electoral performance ceteris paribus , rather than suggesting that they alone explain electoral rise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its founding in 2013, the party has experienced three major conflicts in which its fundamentalist, extreme right grouping Der Flügel (the Wing) gained increased influence in the party, while still lacking ‘hard’ formal power in the party board or delegate congress (Decker 2018). The AfD's attempts to portray itself as a ‘normal’ party were thus accompanied by the growing impact of its extreme right faction and progressive substantive radicalization further to the right (Arzheimer and Berning 2019; Häusler and Roeser 2022; Pytlas 2021). Flügel has managed to keep and increase its influence even despite its nominal ‘dissolution’ in 2020 after the informal grouping was put under observation by the German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz – BfV).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have instead focused on how RWPPs have varying willingness and ability to capitalise on the grievances of certain parts of their electorate (Koopmans and Statham 1999;Mudde 2010;Halikiopoulou et al 2013;Vasilopoulou et al 2014). There has also been recent debate about whether RWPPs are more or less successful when their political competitors accommodate and/or internalise some of their positions (Spoon and Kluver 2020;Pytlas 2021). RWPP success in turn can affect the policy or rhetorical positions of other more established political parties (Abou-Chadi and Krause 2020; Bergmann et al 2021;Puleo 2021;Valentim and Widmann 2021).…”
Section: Very High Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%