1998
DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1997.7194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hilbert Coefficients of Hilbert Filtrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case M is Cohen-Macaulay, we have a solution for a general filtration which broadly extends previous results of [7] and [6]. THEOREM 2.12.…”
Section: When There Is No Ambiguity We Simply Write E Instead Of E(j;supporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the case M is Cohen-Macaulay, we have a solution for a general filtration which broadly extends previous results of [7] and [6]. THEOREM 2.12.…”
Section: When There Is No Ambiguity We Simply Write E Instead Of E(j;supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The coefficient e 0 (I) is called the multiplicity of I. P. Samuel [Sam51] showed existence of this polynomial for the I-adic filtration {I n } n∈Z . Many results about Hilbert polynomials for admissible filtrations were proved in [GR98] and [RV10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can be done by the same argument as the proof of (s n−1 t) n−1 ∈ (s n , t n )(s n , s n−1 t, t n ) n−1 , and hence we have proved (2).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 79%
“…On the other hand, if A is an analytically unramified local ring, then { I n } n≥0 is a Hilbert filtration (cf. [2]), and so there exists a family { e i (I) } 0≤i≤d of integers such that…”
Section: Corollariesmentioning
confidence: 99%