2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hilda asteroids among Jupiter family comets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the ACO sample we found 15, 46 and 59 objects, respectively, that are in excess from the expected values and are indicative of the presence in the ACO population of objects that are not comets in a dormant state. These objects could be asteroids (possibly Hildas) with T J < 3 obtaining their present orbits by some dynamical mechanism that perturbed the original asteroidal orbit changing its Tisserand invariant (Di Sisto et al 2005). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ACO sample we found 15, 46 and 59 objects, respectively, that are in excess from the expected values and are indicative of the presence in the ACO population of objects that are not comets in a dormant state. These objects could be asteroids (possibly Hildas) with T J < 3 obtaining their present orbits by some dynamical mechanism that perturbed the original asteroidal orbit changing its Tisserand invariant (Di Sisto et al 2005). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the unbiased s-value could be higher. Di Sisto et al (2005), analyzing the dynamical evolution of escapees from the 3:2 mean motion resonance, Hildas, found that most of those that are injected into a JFC-like orbit have q > 2.5 AU. They have not been taken into account in the estimated size distribution due to our criterion of minimizing the observational bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di Sisto et al (2005) performed numerical simulations to study the dynamical evolution of Hilda asteroids and found that 99% of the objects escaping from the resonance behave like JFCs, at least during the first 1000 yr. From the physical point of view, it is not easy to differentiate between escaped Hildas and QHCs because both populations are mainly D-and P-types (Fitzsimmons et al 1994;Dahlgren & Lagerkvist 1995;Dahlgren et al 1997Dahlgren et al , 1999Jewitt 2002;Gil-Hutton & Brunini 2008); to distinguish comets from asteroids in the external zone of the main belt it is necessary to study the orbital evolution of these objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%