1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.76.3039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hill and Whaley Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is also supported by the good agreement with the tight-binding results of Delerue et al 5 This calculation was made with a higher-quality empirical parametrization for bulk Si than that used by Hill and Whaley, which accounts for the difference between the two theoretical curves. 25,26 Although our results agree well with the quantum confinement theory, there is a problem with the film grown from the smallest clusters with a mean diameter of 2.5 nm. Considering the theoretical and experimental work known so far, we would expect luminescence around 2.2 eV.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…This assumption is also supported by the good agreement with the tight-binding results of Delerue et al 5 This calculation was made with a higher-quality empirical parametrization for bulk Si than that used by Hill and Whaley, which accounts for the difference between the two theoretical curves. 25,26 Although our results agree well with the quantum confinement theory, there is a problem with the film grown from the smallest clusters with a mean diameter of 2.5 nm. Considering the theoretical and experimental work known so far, we would expect luminescence around 2.2 eV.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The second band is attributed by the authors to the photoluminescence of FeSi 2 , a direct-band gap semiconductor. The first band, however, could be due to silicon nanocrystals since, at low temperature, the recombination of the electron-hole pair on dangling bonds becomes radiative (Hill & Whaley 1996a;Hill & Whaley 1996b;Meyer et al 1993;Gardelis & Hamilton 1994). The energy (in eV) of the emission E p (IR) is then related to the normal photoluminescence energy E p (ERE) according to E p (IR) = 0.43E p (ERE) + 0.34.…”
Section: Other Spectroscopic Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, disagreements among different theoretical models used for describing electronic excitations in these systems remain a subject of significant controversy. For the most part, the disagreements arise from the formulation of the optical gap in confined systems and the calculation of different components such as image charges, self-energies, and excitonic contributions that compose the optical gap [13,14].Most theoretical studies focus primarily on the size dependence of photoluminescence energies and photoabsorption gaps [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. In many cases, such calculations do not evaluate oscillator strengths and cannot explicitly identify optically allowed and dark transitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%