2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0016756801005313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Himalayan inverted metamorphism and syn-convergence extension as a consequence of a general shear extrusion

Abstract: Two paradoxical geological features of the Himalaya are the syn-convergence extension and the inverted metamorphic isograds observed in the crystalline core zone of this orogen. This High Himalayan Crystalline Sequence corresponds to an up to 40 km thick sequence of amphibolite to granulite facies gneiss, bounded by the Main Central Thrust at the base, and by the extensional faults of the South Tibetan Detachment System at the top. Geochronological and structural data demonstrate that coeval movements alo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
238
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(286 reference statements)
14
238
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…(C) Ductile block deforming by pervasive simple shear. (D) Ductile block deforming by general shear with a pure shear component increasing towards the bottom of the wedge, as well as with time following a 'decelerating strain path' (Grasemann et al 1999;Vannay & Grasemann 2001).…”
Section: E X T R U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(C) Ductile block deforming by pervasive simple shear. (D) Ductile block deforming by general shear with a pure shear component increasing towards the bottom of the wedge, as well as with time following a 'decelerating strain path' (Grasemann et al 1999;Vannay & Grasemann 2001).…”
Section: E X T R U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beaumont et al (2001,2004) presented a quantitative model in which this crustal channel was coupled to surface denudation at the High Himalayan front. In contrast, Grasemann et al (1999) and Vannay & Grasemann (2001) proposed a general shear model due to the requirements of strain compatibility, whereby the centre of the channel extruded by pure shear flow, rather than the heterogeneous simple shear model invoked by Grujic et al (1996).…”
Section: Himalayan Channel Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative mechanisms include shear heating (England et al, 1992;Harrison et al, 1998), accretion of radiogenic crustal layers (Huerta et al, 1999;Guillot & Allemand, 2002), thermal conductivity contrast between the crystalline basement and its sedimentary cover (Pinet & Jaupart, 1987), large-scale fluid infiltration that lowers the melting point of overthrust terranes (Le Fort, 1975), slab break-off during collision (Kohn & Parkinson, 2002) and fast decompression of hot metamorphic rocks (Harris & Massey, 1994). Although differing in many respects, most recent models propose that both compressional and extensional faults exert a central role in the orographic development of the orogen (Harris & Massey, 1994;Grujic et al, 1996;Nelson et al, 1996;Beaumont et al, 2001;Vannay & Grasemann, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%