2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00482-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Himalayan metamorphic sequence as an orogenic channel: insight from Bhutan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
486
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(507 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
18
486
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Greater Himalaya is divided into two structural levels: the lower unit is above the MCT but below the out-of-sequence Kakhtang Thrust (KT), while the higher unit is in the hanging wall of the KT (Grujic et al, 2002). Estimates for the initiation of motion on the MCT range from ∼ 25 to 20 Ma (e.g., Hodges et al, 1996;Daniel et al, 2003;Tobgay et al, 2012), with continued shearing in the Bhutan Himalaya through 18-16 Ma (Grujic et al, 2002;Daniel et al, 2003;Kellett et al, 2009). The age of motion on the KT is notably younger (14-8 Ma; Daniel et al, 2003;Grujic et al, 2002Grujic et al, , 2011Coutand et al, 2014).…”
Section: Tectonostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Greater Himalaya is divided into two structural levels: the lower unit is above the MCT but below the out-of-sequence Kakhtang Thrust (KT), while the higher unit is in the hanging wall of the KT (Grujic et al, 2002). Estimates for the initiation of motion on the MCT range from ∼ 25 to 20 Ma (e.g., Hodges et al, 1996;Daniel et al, 2003;Tobgay et al, 2012), with continued shearing in the Bhutan Himalaya through 18-16 Ma (Grujic et al, 2002;Daniel et al, 2003;Kellett et al, 2009). The age of motion on the KT is notably younger (14-8 Ma; Daniel et al, 2003;Grujic et al, 2002Grujic et al, , 2011Coutand et al, 2014).…”
Section: Tectonostratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) developed for the Greater Himalaya along the southern margin of the Tibetan Plateau was proposed initially from field geological mapping and strain data combined with P-T constraints and U-Pb dating of metamorphic rocks and leucogranites (Searle & Rex 1989;Grujic et al 2002;Searle et al 2003Searle et al , 2006Law et al 2004Law et al , 2006Searle & Szulc 2005;Godin et al 2006). The channel flow model infers that a partially molten middle crust layer was extruded south from beneath southern Tibet to the Greater Himalaya during the Early Miocene, at c. 23-15 Ma.…”
Section: Himalayan Channel Flow Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark & Royden 2000;Haines et al 2003) and (b) the Himalayan mid-crustal 'channel flow' model (e.g. Beaumont et al 2001Beaumont et al , 2004Grujic et al 2002;Searle et al 2003Searle et al , 2006Searle et al , 2010bLaw et al 2004Godin et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) shows the Chekha Series to be exposed in what has since been recognized as the area containing both the Tang Chu klippe and the Black Mountain outlier. This view has since been extended to include outcrops of the Chekha Formation in all the Bhutanese outliers and in the Tethyan Himalaya (Grujic, Hollister & Parrish, 2002;McQuarrie et al 2008;Chakungal et al 2010;Long & McQuarrie, 2010). In effect, the term 'Chekha Formation' has become the default stratigraphic name for all sedimentary rocks within the outliers unless they are distinguished by the presence of age-diagnostic fossils.…”
Section: B the Chekha Formation And Its Stratigraphic Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%