1966
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(00)72914-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hindered rotation in 1,2-dineopentyltetramethylbenzene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…observation of individual rotamers. The compounds studied in this manner include 2,6-disubstituted benzyl halides (17), 2,6-dichlorobenzal chloride (l8), 2,4,6-trimethylcumene (19), di-t-butylanisylcarbinol (20), and 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl-5,6-dineopentylbenzene (21). In addition, Can.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observation of individual rotamers. The compounds studied in this manner include 2,6-disubstituted benzyl halides (17), 2,6-dichlorobenzal chloride (l8), 2,4,6-trimethylcumene (19), di-t-butylanisylcarbinol (20), and 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl-5,6-dineopentylbenzene (21). In addition, Can.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hindered rotation about the CAr---CH2 bonds in dineopentylprehnitene in solution, as studied by NMR methods, is described by Dix et al (1966).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first recorded instance of rotation about an sp 3 -sp 2 carbon-carbon single bond giving rise to a dnmr phenomenon is due to Dix et al (1966), who determined the rotational barrier of the neopentyl groups in (ΧΠΙ) (Entry 1, Table III) by observing the collapse of the anisochronicity of the methylene protons with increase in temperature. Since then, a large number of examples has been reported (Table III) and these include systematic studies in series of related compounds as well as a number of interesting isolated observations.…”
Section: ιπ Rotation About Sp 3 -Sp 2 Carbon-carbon Single Bondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawkins et al (1971) Hawkins et al (1971) Hawkins et al (1971) Hawkins et al (1971) Hawkins et al (1971) Hawkins et al (1971 Anderson and Pearson (1971a) Anderson and Pearson (1971a) Anderson and Pearson (1971b) Anderson and Pearson (1971b) Anderson and Pearson (1971b) Anderson and Pearson (1971b) Anderson and Pearson (1971b) Anderson and Pearson (1971b) Anderson and Pearson (1972a) Anderson and Pearson (1972a) Anderson and Pearson (1972a) Anderson and Pearson (1972b) Anderson and Pearson (1972b) Anderson and Pearson (1972b) Anderson and Pearson (1972b) Anderson and Pearson (1972b) Bushweller and Anderson (1972) Bushweller and Anderson (1972) Dix et al (1966) Rieker and Kessler (1969) Rieker and Kessler (1969) Rieker and Kessler (1969) ) Siddall and Stewart (1968a, 1969b Siddall and Stewart (1969b) Siddall and Stewart (1969b) Siddall and Stewart (1969b) Siddall and Stewart (1969b); Bartle et al (1970) Siddall and Stewart (1969b…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%