1988
DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(88)90056-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hindered settling and hydrodynamic dispersion in quiescent sedimenting suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
121
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Koch & Shaqfeh (1991) predict that long-range hydrodynamic interactions cause the hydrodynamic diffusivity to increase with decreasing concentration. Experiments with nearly monodisperse suspensions by Davis & Hassen (1988) and Ham & Homsy (1988) gave hydrodynamic diffusivities of O(aU,) which increase with increasing concentration for dilute suspensions, reach a maximum at a concentration of only a few percent by volume, and then decrease with further concentration increases. It may be that the initial increase at low concentrations is due to a change in mechanism from pairs separating due to the small differences in particle sizes to pairs separating because of encountering a third particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, Koch & Shaqfeh (1991) predict that long-range hydrodynamic interactions cause the hydrodynamic diffusivity to increase with decreasing concentration. Experiments with nearly monodisperse suspensions by Davis & Hassen (1988) and Ham & Homsy (1988) gave hydrodynamic diffusivities of O(aU,) which increase with increasing concentration for dilute suspensions, reach a maximum at a concentration of only a few percent by volume, and then decrease with further concentration increases. It may be that the initial increase at low concentrations is due to a change in mechanism from pairs separating due to the small differences in particle sizes to pairs separating because of encountering a third particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of additional interest is the possibility of predicting the velocity variance and the coefficient of hydrodynamic diffusivity, which are measures of the fluctuations in the settling speeds of individual sedimenting particles. Hydrodynamic diffusion during batch sedimentation of nearly monodisperse suspensions has been observed experimentally by Davis & Hassen (1988), who measured the rate of spreading of the interface a t the top of the suspension, and by Ham & Homsy (1988), who measured the variance in the time for a marked sphere in the interior of the suspension to fall through a given distance. It should be emphasized that the phenomenon of hydrodynamic diffusion arises from hydrodynamic interactions between particles in the suspension fluid, and is unrelated to Brownian diffusion which arises from the thermal motion of the fluid molecules surrounding each particle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted velocity fluctuation divergence received both theoretical and experimental scrutiny without consensus [5,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Computer simulations support the conclusion, finding an increase in the amplitude of velocity fluctuations with system size [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These simulations relax assumptions (ii) and (iii), since they approximate many particle hydrodynamics and the system may evolve via hydrodynamic interactions away from initially randomized configurations. On the other hand, experiments find no dependence on system size, either experiments measuring the diffusion of a test particle [11][12][13] or direct measurements of the velocity fluctuations [7]. Koch and Shaqfeh [14] gave the first explanation for the absence of divergent velocity fluctuations in terms of a violation of assumption (iii), where every particle has a net deficit of one particle surrounding it within a correlation range j.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the first was the three-parameter Markov model [107,112], which used the variance and autocorrelation of velocity as additional parameters. A decade later, a model was developed [55] (see also [37]) that combined the variance and autocorrelation in a coefficient of self-induced hydrodynamic diffusion. Thus, the two models are related, but not identical [106].…”
Section: Physical Explanation Of Lemma 61 Recall That Fmentioning
confidence: 99%