Hindrances to Effective Implementation of the Habitats Directive in Italy: Regional Differences in Designating Special Areas of Conservation

Abstract

Natura 2000" is a coordinated network of protected areas that stretches across the European Union in compliance with two directives (the so-called "Habitats Directive" and the "Birds Directive") that underpin the Union's policies on biodiversity conservation. This study is aimed at assessing the implementation of the network by qualitatively analyzing how Special Areas of Conservation are being designated. Such designation process, which is being implemented, although with great delay, in a number of member states, entails the establishment of site-specific conservation measures that may be included within appropriate management plans or other development plans. A systematic documental analysis of official acts establishing Special Areas of Conservation and approving conservation measures and management plans was performed by taking Italy as a case study. The analysis focuses on four key topics, as follows: use of conservation measures and appropriate management plans; multi-level governance of the Natura 2000 sites, in terms of involved institutions and tiers of government; stakeholders' inclusion in the designation process; and the relationship between conservation measures and the wider spatial planning system. The results show significant differences regarding the implementation of the Natura 2000 network and highlight potential general hindrances to completing the designation process in the European Union.

Conservation of transnational species: The tensions between legal requirements and best scientific evidence

“…fisheries bycatch). These measures apply through the entire range of the protected species listed in Annex IV. Despite the Directive representing a key nature conservation statute in Europe, its value has been questioned particularly with regard to perceived impacts on business (Morris, 2011; Stookes, 2012; Krämer, 2013; Kleining, 2017; Lai, 2020). This perception has been exacerbated by the legal approach taken by the European Commission regarding enforcement of the required measures.…”

Mobility, infrastructure and human environment relations in the Anthropocene

“…However, economic and environmental interests are often at odds, for example where the protection of rare or endangered species becomes an obstacle to economic activities. Legislation such as the ‘Endangered Species Act’ in the USA (Scoville, 2019) or the European ‘Habitats Directive’ and other related laws (Lai, 2020; Squintani, 2020), aimed at balancing environmental and economic objectives, highlight the potential for friction between the different interest groups.…”

Intermediary Organizations in Nature Conservation Initiatives: The Case of the EU-Funded LIFE Programme

“…To this end, we formulated a specific research hypothesis regarding bridging organizations and their control and transmission of information within the network of LIFE-NAT projects. Considering the state's responsibility for the management of protected areas and generally for the implementation of conservation measures [101][102][103], we suppose that the central players in the LIFE-NAT network are state actors, although their central role is mediated by other actors (Hypothesis 4).…”