2008
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2008.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hindsight in the relative abundance, metabolic potential and genome dynamics of uncultivated marine archaea from comparative metagenomic analyses of bathypelagic plankton of different oceanic regions

Abstract: Marine planktonic archaea are widespread and abundant in deep oceanic waters but, despite their obvious ecological importance, little is known about them. Metagenomic analyses of large genome fragments allow access to both gene content and genome structure from single individuals of these cultivation-reluctant organisms. We present the comparative analysis of 22 archaeal genomic clones containing 16S rRNA genes that were selected from four metagenomic libraries constructed from meso- and bathypelagic plankton … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
132
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analysis of complete fosmid sequences The 21 archaeal fosmids containing 16S rRNA genes used for our analysis are those recently described by Martín-Cuadrado et al (2008). Twenty of them were retrieved by phylogenetic screening of three fosmid libraries constructed from deep-sea planktonic samples: AD1000 (Adriatic Sea, 1000 m depth, seven fosmids), KM3 (Ionian Sea, 3000 m depth, eight fosmids) and SAT1000 (South Atlantic, 1000 m depth, five fosmids).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Phylogenetic analysis of complete fosmid sequences The 21 archaeal fosmids containing 16S rRNA genes used for our analysis are those recently described by Martín-Cuadrado et al (2008). Twenty of them were retrieved by phylogenetic screening of three fosmid libraries constructed from deep-sea planktonic samples: AD1000 (Adriatic Sea, 1000 m depth, seven fosmids), KM3 (Ionian Sea, 3000 m depth, eight fosmids) and SAT1000 (South Atlantic, 1000 m depth, five fosmids).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with Thaumarchaeota, these euryarchaeotal groups lack any cultured representative and their metabolic capabilities remain unknown, except for the indication of a possible phototrophic metabolism in group II archaea from surface waters . Group II Euryarchaeota usually appear to be relatively more abundant in surface waters compared with Thaumarchaeota (Karner et al, 2001;Ghai et al, 2010), but they may be abundant in deep-sea waters as well, reaching in some oceanic regions even higher proportions than Thaumarchaeota (Martín-Cuadrado et al, 2008). The much more enigmatic group III Euryarchaeota have been almost exclusively detected in deep-sea plankton, and are found in general in lower abundance than Thaumarchaeota and group II Euryarchaeota (Fuhrman and Davis, 1997;Martín-Cuadrado et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations