2006
DOI: 10.1163/156853506776114474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hindu Traditions and Nature: Survey Article

Abstract: The scholarly investigation of the convergences between Hindu traditions and the natural world is a relatively recent endeavor, having arisen in the wake of similar projects seeking to identify the intersections between religion, culture, and nature. Partly a response to present and looming environmental threats, this effort has resulted in a wide range of material, from a more general "environmental assessment" of the tradition(s) in question to specific inquiries about the social, economic, and demographic f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the hierarchical view, Eastern religious adherents may espouse a more heterarchical organizational structure of the divine and nature (Narayanan, 2001; Sarre, 1995; Van Horn, 2006). For example, Lauma is the Hindu goddess of trees, and Prajanya is the Hindu goddess of rain.…”
Section: Religious Beliefs and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the hierarchical view, Eastern religious adherents may espouse a more heterarchical organizational structure of the divine and nature (Narayanan, 2001; Sarre, 1995; Van Horn, 2006). For example, Lauma is the Hindu goddess of trees, and Prajanya is the Hindu goddess of rain.…”
Section: Religious Beliefs and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rethinking constitutional secularism entails situating the ban on cow slaughter in larger contexts including those of ecology, spirituality (Korom 2000;von Horn 2006) and "'casteised speciesism', or discriminatory practices towards non-humans, in this case by imposing casteist hierarchies on all bovines-the ostensibly protected cow as well as the unprotected buffalo" (Narayanan 2018: 351). With respect to these, the Supreme Court decision of 2005 highlights both economic/ecological as well as compassionate grounds for not slaughtering 'milch cattle' and 'draught cattle' past service.…”
Section: Conversion and Cow Protection: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%