Hip arthroplasty. Part 2: normal and abnormal radiographic findings

Pluot, E.; Davis, Edward T.; Revell, Matthew P.; Davies, A. M.; James, Steven

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.05.002

Cited by 37 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thin, linear radiolucent zones may also be noted at the cementcomponent interface, particularly at the proximal-lateral aspect of the stem [11]. Although this may be explained by inadequate contact between the implant and the cement, it may also be explained by the Mach effect [12] -a form of edge enhancement between two areas of different density on x-ray imaging.…”

Section: Causes Of Increased Radiolucencymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…They have been found to be good indicators of implant stability [11]. Thickening of the femoral cortical shaft may also occur at the point of contact with the implant's stem.…”

Section: Sclerotic Reactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is known as a bone pedestal ( Figure 4). Although it may be associated with tip stability, it is also encountered just as frequently in unstable implants [11]. Cautious further evaluation and sequential radiographic follow-up is therefore advisable when this sign is encountered as well as observation for other signs of stability or instability.…”

Section: Sclerotic Reactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Approximately 70% of these patients are symptomatic [11]. Certain factors are thought to increase the chances of heterotopic ossification developing.…”

Section: Soft Tissue Abnormalities Heterotopic Ossificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Certain factors are thought to increase the chances of heterotopic ossification developing. These include male gender, ankylosing spondylosis, post-traumatic arthritis, previous heterotopic ossification, previous hip fusion, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, Paget's disease, extensive osteophytosis, head injury, and Parkinson's disease [11].…”

Section: Soft Tissue Abnormalities Heterotopic Ossificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Understanding, Interpreting and Reporting a Total Hip Arthroplasty Radiograph

Chan¹,

Khoriati²,

Chiang³

et al. 2017

Orthop Muscular Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of Total Hip Arthroplasties (THAs) in England is increasing. Careful analysis of THA radiographs, by both orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists, is key to ascertaining both the short and the long-term survival and function of the implants in question. The aim of this article is to provide the reader with a systematic approach to assessing post-operative THA radiographs, with sufficient knowledge to critique the procedure and assess for complications. An outline of the prostheses, role of cement, positioning, and complications is presented. The authors also recommend a format for presenting these radiographs in a clear and structured manner.

show abstract

Section: Causes Of Increased Radiolucencymentioning

confidence: 98%

“…They have been found to be good indicators of implant stability [11]. Thickening of the femoral cortical shaft may also occur at the point of contact with the implant's stem.…”

Section: Sclerotic Reactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sclerotic Reactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Approximately 70% of these patients are symptomatic [11]. Certain factors are thought to increase the chances of heterotopic ossification developing.…”

Section: Soft Tissue Abnormalities Heterotopic Ossificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Soft Tissue Abnormalities Heterotopic Ossificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Understanding, Interpreting and Reporting a Total Hip Arthroplasty Radiograph

Chan¹,

Khoriati²,

Chiang³

et al. 2017

Orthop Muscular Syst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Detecting total hip replacement prosthesis design on plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network

Borjali

Chen

Muratoglu

et al. 2020

Journal Orthopaedic Research

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Identifying the design of a failed implant is a key step in the preoperative planning of revision total joint arthroplasty. Manual identification of the implant design from radiographic images is time‐consuming and prone to error. Failure to identify the implant design preoperatively can lead to increased operating room time, more complex surgery, increased blood loss, increased bone loss, increased recovery time, and overall increased healthcare costs. In this study, we present a novel, fully automatic and interpretable approach to identify the design of total hip replacement (THR) implants from plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network (CNN). CNN achieved 100% accuracy in the identification of three commonly used THR implant designs. Such CNN can be used to automatically identify the design of a failed THR implant preoperatively in just a few seconds, saving time and improving the identification accuracy. This can potentially improve patient outcomes, free practitioners' time, and reduce healthcare costs.

show abstract

Postoperative Imaging of Hip Arthroplasty

Mohamed Shah,

Tandon

2024

Medical Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hip arthroplasty. Part 2: normal and abnormal radiographic findings

Cited by 37 publications

References 53 publications

Understanding, Interpreting and Reporting a Total Hip Arthroplasty Radiograph

Understanding, Interpreting and Reporting a Total Hip Arthroplasty Radiograph

Detecting total hip replacement prosthesis design on plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network

Postoperative Imaging of Hip Arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About