1991
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199107000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip Dysplasia, Subluxation, and Dislocation in Cerebral Palsy: An Arthrographic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients of more than 30 years of age are in less pain than the patients under 30 years. We expected the opposite result because if pain is a consequence of cartilage erosion, one would expect more pain with time (Heinrich 1991, Lundy 1998. It is difficult to interpret this result because of a selected survival bias in this cross-sectional study as the patients with the most severe disabilities (those who are most in pain) are likely to die younger (Maudsley 1999, Schwartz 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Patients of more than 30 years of age are in less pain than the patients under 30 years. We expected the opposite result because if pain is a consequence of cartilage erosion, one would expect more pain with time (Heinrich 1991, Lundy 1998. It is difficult to interpret this result because of a selected survival bias in this cross-sectional study as the patients with the most severe disabilities (those who are most in pain) are likely to die younger (Maudsley 1999, Schwartz 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We expected the opposite result because if pain is a consequence of cartilage erosion, one would expect more pain with time (Heinrich 1991, Lundy 1998. It is difficult to interpret this result because of a selected survival bias in this cross-sectional study as the patients with the most severe disabilities (those who are most in pain) are likely to die younger (Maudsley 1999, Schwartz 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A consensus-building session involving four orthopaedic surgeons with 15, 13, 11, and 10 years of orthopaedic experience took place to define radiographic measurements and determine the typically developing comparison group. Previous studies were reviewed, 8,13,18,19,[25][26][27][28] and one of the authors pooled three items relevant to measuring hip displacement: migration percentage, acetabular index, and centre-edge angle on hip anterior-posterior radiography. Reliability and validity were considered important when choosing the radiographic index, and migration percentage was selected by consensus on that basis.…”
Section: Consensus Building For Radiographic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%