2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02202-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip implant performance prediction by acoustic emission techniques: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…joint wear and friction) and [20] on the evaluation of hip replacement constructs. The latest review [89] in the field of hip implant performance prediction by acoustic techniques covered this relatively narrow topic.…”
Section: E Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…joint wear and friction) and [20] on the evaluation of hip replacement constructs. The latest review [89] in the field of hip implant performance prediction by acoustic techniques covered this relatively narrow topic.…”
Section: E Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrasting the AE sensing approach to clinical joint diagnosis techniques, it is a passive technique that poses minimal risk of infection and radiation and is affordable, as well as being a non-invasive means towards the acquisition of rich signal information that can be utilised towards the diagnosis and assessment of joint health [14]. AE has predominantly seen traditional use in condition monitoring and maintenance of machinery components, in addition to process monitoring, but recent scientific advancements have seen applications of the technique in areas such as biomechanics and orthopaedics, as mentioned [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Means Of Diagnosing Joint Pathologies Their Shortcomings and Aementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiography method can only be used to detect more severe cases of damage and cannot detect early or minor damage [3]. The biggest disadvantage is that the use of this technique increases the risk of cancer by altering the structure of the molecule [4]; ultrasound technology requires the sensor to be placed vertically on the skin for detection [5], which is difficult to achieve due to the complex structure of the hip; magnetic resonance imaging is not a non-destructive method and does not allow continuous detection, and is expensive compared to AE technology; dye penetration techniques require that the material being examined is transparent, however, hip is not transparent [3], so the application of dye penetration techniques is not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%