1993
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90058-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
575
3
26

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,134 publications
(650 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
25
575
3
26
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated peak forces for human and dog compare well to in vivo hip-joint force measurements from the literature that showed peak forces during stance phase of normal walking of 211-410 % BW in humans (Bergmann et al 2001(Bergmann et al , 1993(Bergmann et al , 1984 and approximately 165 % BW in dogs (Page et al 1993). At least in humans, these values depend on the walking speed as shown by increasing values from 280 % BW at 1 km h −1 to 480 % BW at 5 km h −1 , and 550 % BW when jogging (Bergmann et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Calculated peak forces for human and dog compare well to in vivo hip-joint force measurements from the literature that showed peak forces during stance phase of normal walking of 211-410 % BW in humans (Bergmann et al 2001(Bergmann et al , 1993(Bergmann et al , 1984 and approximately 165 % BW in dogs (Page et al 1993). At least in humans, these values depend on the walking speed as shown by increasing values from 280 % BW at 1 km h −1 to 480 % BW at 5 km h −1 , and 550 % BW when jogging (Bergmann et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…At least in humans, these values depend on the walking speed as shown by increasing values from 280 % BW at 1 km h −1 to 480 % BW at 5 km h −1 , and 550 % BW when jogging (Bergmann et al 1993). Peak forces measured during normal walking are slightly below our estimates, likely because our approach provides estimates of the prevalent loading history also including larger forces such as during faster walking or jogging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both the magnitude and direction of contact force may vary depending on the external load from the ground reaction force and surrounding muscle force, the head displacement, and the duration of contact, which should be determined with the full dynamic model. Instead, in this study, the load in the vertical direction with a wide range of magnitudes from 0.5 to 3.0 kN was considered as the major loading component according to ISO 14242‐1:2002 standard for a walking cycle used with hip simulator36 and measured data with implanted prostheses37 during walking, and chosen for each of the head displacements considered. In order to implement such a static contact analysis, it is required to restrain the rotation of the head to avoid rigid body motion problem; in this study, to achieve such constraint, an adjacent node within a distance <1 mm to the head centre on the vertical axis of the head was chosen and assigned the same lateral displacement constraint along the X ‐axis as the head centre (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%