2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3892-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip osteonecroses treated with calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate bone graft substitute have different results according to the cause of osteonecrosis: alcohol abuse or corticosteroid-induced

Abstract: Presented treatment of ONFH significantly improves hip function, offers pain reduction, and gives similar functional improvement for hips scoring grade II and III on the Ficat and Arlet scale. A good response to operative treatment is seen in patients with alcohol-induced ONFH, but not in those with steroid-induced ONFH.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is true that the results of core decompression alone are confusing: considering that small lesions do not progress or progress slowly without any intervention and the fact that core decompression shows better outcomes in hips with small early lesions, core decompression alone might be considered sometimes as a treatment that is not so efficient; however, it provides symptomatic relief, and it appears to prevent collapse in early stages. Some authors have associated core decompression to bone substitute or tantalum implants [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Core Decompression and Mechanical Adjuvant To Prevent Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that the results of core decompression alone are confusing: considering that small lesions do not progress or progress slowly without any intervention and the fact that core decompression shows better outcomes in hips with small early lesions, core decompression alone might be considered sometimes as a treatment that is not so efficient; however, it provides symptomatic relief, and it appears to prevent collapse in early stages. Some authors have associated core decompression to bone substitute or tantalum implants [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Core Decompression and Mechanical Adjuvant To Prevent Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broken cartilage and necrotic subchondral bone was no longer replanted. Compared with previous studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] , this report includes superior results. The rate of clinical success (good or excellent outcome) was 92.5% for 67 hips.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The rationale for head-preserving procedures is the desire to provide sufficient and long-lasting support to necrotic subchondral bone and cartilage [38] , in order to prevent collapse and subsequent osteoarthrosis of the joint. A tantalum rod was used to provide direct mechanical support [16] ; a bone graft was aimed to replace dead bone with viable bone [12][13][14] . Various types of stem cells and/or biofactors were used to facilitate bone formation and remodeling, alone or in combination with other methods [15,19] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It remains difficult for the orthopedic surgeon to feel justified a THA even with new implants [15,16] in a young patient simply for hip pain without femoral head collapse. Several conservative approaches [17,18] have been proposed for osteonecrosis treatment including weight restriction and observation, core decompression, various osteotomies, and bone grafting (structural or nonstructural and fibula vascularized or non-vascularized). However, these techniques have high failures reports for some of them, and others change the morphology of the hip which may be non-esthetic in a young woman [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%