2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-003-0195-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning

Abstract: The criteria for acetabular cup positioning during total hip replacement are a matter of considerable discussion, particularly with regards to the optimal degree of anteversion. "Anatomical anteversion" is defined in the transverse plane, and "surgical anteversion" in the sagittal plane. Computed tomography measurements of anteversion are characteristic of a given transverse section plane and fail to take into account the position of the pelvis. We suggest a simple method for evaluating acetabular cup position… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sacral gradient was defined as the angle between the upper endplate of S1 and the horizontal plane. The sacral gradient averages 60° in the supine position [38], 40° in standing [19], and between 0° and 29° in the sitting position [18]. These authors [38] found anteversion measurements in all three positions diminished with forward pelvic tilt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sacral gradient was defined as the angle between the upper endplate of S1 and the horizontal plane. The sacral gradient averages 60° in the supine position [38], 40° in standing [19], and between 0° and 29° in the sitting position [18]. These authors [38] found anteversion measurements in all three positions diminished with forward pelvic tilt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of its angle with the vertical often exceeds 45° [17, 18]. This can be seen on scout views of pelvic CT scan.…”
Section: Fundamental Principles: Postural Variations Of the Lumbopelvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the time these slices, perpendicular to the plane of the examination table, do not correspond to the anatomic plane because the position of the supine subject has a more or less marked sagittal pelvic tilt [17]. The variation in the anteversion measured is approximately 0.5 for 1° of rotation of the plane of the slice in relation to the pelvis [18, 34, 35]. …”
Section: Influence Of Sagittal Posture On Cross-sectional Acetabular mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acetabular parameters are less used in the management of CP: 1) acetabular anteversion (AAnt) reflects the rotation of the acetabulum around the vertical axis [22]. In order to render this angle morphological, the vertical axis was defined as the perpendicular to the sacral plate; 2) acetabular inclination (AInc) reflects the rotation of the acetabulum around the postero-anterior axis, defined as a parallel to the sacral plate [22,23]; 3) acetabular tilt reflects the rotation of the acetabulum around the mediolateral axis of the pelvis [24]. The list and the description of each of these parameters are detailed in Table 2 and displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Radiological Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%