2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIPPIE v2.0: enhancing meaningfulness and reliability of protein–protein interaction networks

Abstract: The increasing number of experimentally detected interactions between proteins makes it difficult for researchers to extract the interactions relevant for specific biological processes or diseases. This makes it necessary to accompany the large-scale detection of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) with strategies and tools to generate meaningful PPI subnetworks. To this end, we generated the Human Integrated Protein–Protein Interaction rEference or HIPPIE (http://cbdm.uni-mainz.de/hippie/). HIPPIE is a one-st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
404
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(428 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
404
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first version of CellMap built upon a reliable dataset with multi‐localization annotations for the human proteome (Ramilowski et al., 2015) assembled from the Human Protein Atlas [HPA (Uhlén et al., 2015)], Swiss‐Prot [RRID:SCR_002380 (The UniProt Consortium, 2019)], and, when unavailable, from either homology or predictions (Goldberg et al., 2014). Experimental PPI interactions were taken from HIPPIE (Alanis‐Lobato et al., 2017), providing an estimate for the reliability of PPI annotations. While both the visualization tool and the web server may be extended greatly, and users may employ different data sources, the public instance of CellMap (http://cellmap.protein.properties) fulfills this purpose to date.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The first version of CellMap built upon a reliable dataset with multi‐localization annotations for the human proteome (Ramilowski et al., 2015) assembled from the Human Protein Atlas [HPA (Uhlén et al., 2015)], Swiss‐Prot [RRID:SCR_002380 (The UniProt Consortium, 2019)], and, when unavailable, from either homology or predictions (Goldberg et al., 2014). Experimental PPI interactions were taken from HIPPIE (Alanis‐Lobato et al., 2017), providing an estimate for the reliability of PPI annotations. While both the visualization tool and the web server may be extended greatly, and users may employ different data sources, the public instance of CellMap (http://cellmap.protein.properties) fulfills this purpose to date.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this protocol, many small tweaks have been implemented in the user interface, based on feedback from 3 years of running the system. Additionally, the dataset has been updated with the latest annotations from HIPPIE (Alanis‐Lobato et al., 2017) and enriched with annotations for binary interactions from APID (Alonso‐López et al., 2019). We have removed the HIPPIE (Alanis‐Lobato et al., 2017) interactions with score below 0.01 to make sure that only reliable PPIs are presented.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…None of them are capable of extracting other important PPI information, such as interaction directions, effects, and functional annotations. Such information is essential core knowledge in PPI repository for helping researchers construct protein interaction networks, detect signaling pathways, and discover meaningful protein interactions . Moreover, most of current systems lack batch processing capabilities and the ability to integrate and visualize results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%