2001
DOI: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hippocampal Injections of Amyloid β-Peptide 1-40 Impair Subsequent One-Trial/Day Reward Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous animal models have been until now generated to reproduce, at least partly, the neural and behavioural characteristics of AD patients. Among those, both the acute or continuous administration of various fragments of Ab either in situ (nucleus basalis [1], hippocampus [2], amygdala [3]) or in the lateral cerebral ventricle [4][5][6] have been reported to cause behavioural alterations mainly reflecting defects in temporal lobe depending memory [1,[4][5][6][7]. Demonstration that infusion of Ab into the lateral cerebral ventricle blocks hippocampal LTP in vivo [8] was in agreement with these behavioural findings.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Numerous animal models have been until now generated to reproduce, at least partly, the neural and behavioural characteristics of AD patients. Among those, both the acute or continuous administration of various fragments of Ab either in situ (nucleus basalis [1], hippocampus [2], amygdala [3]) or in the lateral cerebral ventricle [4][5][6] have been reported to cause behavioural alterations mainly reflecting defects in temporal lobe depending memory [1,[4][5][6][7]. Demonstration that infusion of Ab into the lateral cerebral ventricle blocks hippocampal LTP in vivo [8] was in agreement with these behavioural findings.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…1 A) (99.48 Ϯ 1.43% of baseline slope at 120 min after tetanus, n ϭ 5; F (1, 7) ϭ 1.003, p Ͼ 0.1 compared with control slices, n ϭ 4). As a control for nonspecific effects of the peptide, we tested A␤ 1-42 with a scrambled sequence (Malin et al, 2001), which did not affect the amount of potentiation (supplemental Fig. 9, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material).…”
Section: Dea/no An No Donor Protects Against A␤-induced Impairment mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, P2X7R activation by ATP or the high affinity P2X7R agonist BzATP (3'-O-(4-benzoyl)benzoyl-ATP) (Erb et al, 1990) significantly enhanced ROS production in primary rat microglia, and P2X7R–expressing microglia in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice exhibited significant ROS production that colocalized with decreased expression of the synapse protein postsynaptic density-95 (PSD-95), suggesting that P2X7R–mediated ROS production by microglia cells contributes to synaptic loss in this mouse model of AD (Parvathenani et al, 2003; Lee et al, 2011). Microglial P2X7R upregulation was also observed in a rat model where Aβ 1-42 was directly injected into the hippocampus, which lead to memory deficits and degeneration of hippocampal neurons within 7 days (Kowall et al, 1991; Malin et al, 2001; McLarnon et al, 2006). Administration of the selective P2X7R antagonist Brilliant Blue G (BBG) (Jiang et al, 2000) following hippocampal Aβ 1-42 injection was shown to confer neuroprotection and reduce inflammatory responses, reactive gliosis and neuronal loss in the hippocampus (Ryu and McLarnon, 2008).…”
Section: P2 Receptors In Alzheimer’s Diseasementioning
confidence: 87%