2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00538-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hiring you makes me look bad: Social-identity based reversals of the ingroup favoritism effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the previously described inconsistency in the effects of age similarity stems from researchers' failure to consider individuals' perceptions of similar others. Our results, in conjunction with those of Lewis and Sherman (2003), suggest that perceived similarity may correspond with in-group favoritism only when similar others are regarded favorably. This seems to imply that older workers, often a stigmatized group, possess an identity affirmation motive that influences their engagement.…”
Section: Practical and Research Implicationssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Perhaps the previously described inconsistency in the effects of age similarity stems from researchers' failure to consider individuals' perceptions of similar others. Our results, in conjunction with those of Lewis and Sherman (2003), suggest that perceived similarity may correspond with in-group favoritism only when similar others are regarded favorably. This seems to imply that older workers, often a stigmatized group, possess an identity affirmation motive that influences their engagement.…”
Section: Practical and Research Implicationssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Those ingroup members who can do so are preferred over comparable outgroup members. In contrast, ingroup members who threaten to undermine the positive ingroup image (for example, because they are less qualified) are not favored (Lewis and Sherman 2003).…”
Section: Social Identity Theory (Sit) and The Threat-based Skill Paramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having two or more social identities that are inconsistent in terms of status is not uncommon in modern organizations given their complexity and diversity. For example, Black executives can identify with two groups that may be inconsistent in terms of status: Black (traditionally, a relatively low-status or stigmatized group based on race; Lewis and Sherman, 2003) and executives (a relatively high-status group based on organizational hierarchy). Examining the issue of multiple social identities cannot only enrich social identity theory but also contribute to understanding the mechanisms that influence between-group and within-group processes in modern organizations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%