17th Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics, and Lasers Conference 1984
DOI: 10.2514/6.1984-1646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HISSS - A higher-order subsonic/supersonic singularity method for calculating linearized potential flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was implemented by programs following PANAIR such as HISSS [6] and MARCAP [7]. One other key common characteristic between all the aforementioned methods is the use of a structured surface discretization, which places a large burden on the user to correctly prepare geometry for evaluation.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…was implemented by programs following PANAIR such as HISSS [6] and MARCAP [7]. One other key common characteristic between all the aforementioned methods is the use of a structured surface discretization, which places a large burden on the user to correctly prepare geometry for evaluation.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it allows for the implementation of boundary layer models since the solved velocities vary linearly across the body [6]. The primary downside of using quadratically varying doublets is the complexity introduced in the solution to the BIEs, which in turn results in substantially longer computation times relative to using a lower-order doublet distribution.…”
Section: Higher-order Doublet Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the original PrADO only considered subsonic flow running a simple linearized method (lifting line theory only for the wing) for aerodynamic calculations a completely different aerodynamic model had to be installed into PrADO-Sup. This model running the panel code HISSS [2] currently handles a combined wing-fuselage with flaps and is described in detail in the following chapter. With the aerodynamic data achieved, the engines can be detined to tit into the FAR requirements, so take-off distance, climb angle, single engine climb and transonic transmission are checked.…”
Section: Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For supersonic flow a more expensive model has to be used to consider planform-, thickness-, chamber-, twist-effects or the influence of the fuseJage, empennage and nacelles. Furthermore, requirements for a code to run within a preliminary design process are robustness, high accuracy and minimum run time.Considering all these topics the panel code HISSS [2] was chosen in conjunction with a DLR grid generator [4] to provide valid data in a wide range of both subsonic and supersonic flow.…”
Section: The Aerodynamic Model Of Prado-supmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the final evaluation of the technologies and concepts is based on integrated predesign studies with an improved version of the Preliminary Design and Optimization Program PrADO, [1][2][3] originally developed at the Institute of Aircraft Design and Structure Mechanics of Technical University Braunschweig. For this purpose, the aerodynamics module of PrADO was improved by the implementation of the Higher-Order Subsonic / Supersonic Singularity Method HISSS, 4 provided by Daimler-Benz Aerospace (DASA), Munich. In addition the flight mechanics module of PrADO was extended to allow the simulation of trimed missions for TSA configurations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%