1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-8329(98)00034-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histaminergic Activation of Endogenous Angiotensin II Fails to Inhibit Alcohol Intake in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have been criticized (Weisinger et al, 1999a) on the grounds that they mostly used manipulations of peripheral Ang II and so do not negate an opposite effect in brain, or they use a limited time access paradigm to monitor ethanol intake. Kraly and Jones (1999) also could not support the hypothesis that Ang II provides an inhibitory physiological control of ingestion of ethanol, and in fact demonstrated that losartan significantly inhibited alcohol intake in a two-bottle drink test. Finally, the work of Grupp and colleagues that hypothesized that Ang II reduced alcohol intake was tested in alcoholic humans and the results of that study were negative (Naranjo et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These studies have been criticized (Weisinger et al, 1999a) on the grounds that they mostly used manipulations of peripheral Ang II and so do not negate an opposite effect in brain, or they use a limited time access paradigm to monitor ethanol intake. Kraly and Jones (1999) also could not support the hypothesis that Ang II provides an inhibitory physiological control of ingestion of ethanol, and in fact demonstrated that losartan significantly inhibited alcohol intake in a two-bottle drink test. Finally, the work of Grupp and colleagues that hypothesized that Ang II reduced alcohol intake was tested in alcoholic humans and the results of that study were negative (Naranjo et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%