1979
DOI: 10.1039/c39790000997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histidine residues of myoglobin studied by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resonance 11 (Figure 16a) shows a large degree of broadening at low pH at 20 °C but not at 40 °C, which is similar to the broadening behavior of resonance 12 in CNMb. We propose that the two resonances in CNMb and COMb probably arise from the same proton and, hence, tentatively assign resonance 11 in COMb to His-24 H-2, rather than as previously to His-64 H-2 (Bradbury et al, 1979(Bradbury et al, ,1981. The argument for the previous assignment, viz., the similarity of pK values ( 4.5) between resonance 21 (Figure 15) assigned to His-64 H-4 and resonance 11, is not applicable because of lack of connectivity between resonances 11 and 21 in a COSY 2D NMR spectrum (P. E. Wright, private communication).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Resonance 11 (Figure 16a) shows a large degree of broadening at low pH at 20 °C but not at 40 °C, which is similar to the broadening behavior of resonance 12 in CNMb. We propose that the two resonances in CNMb and COMb probably arise from the same proton and, hence, tentatively assign resonance 11 in COMb to His-24 H-2, rather than as previously to His-64 H-2 (Bradbury et al, 1979(Bradbury et al, ,1981. The argument for the previous assignment, viz., the similarity of pK values ( 4.5) between resonance 21 (Figure 15) assigned to His-64 H-4 and resonance 11, is not applicable because of lack of connectivity between resonances 11 and 21 in a COSY 2D NMR spectrum (P. E. Wright, private communication).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Resonances 15 and 18 are not observed in metMb and are assigned to His-36 and His-97 by matching pAfs of H-2 resonances. The upfield resonance 21 was previously assigned to the distal histidine-64 H-4 (Bradbury et al, 1979) on the basis of proximity to the large ring current of the porphyrin and will be discussed in the accompanying paper (Bradbury & Carver, 1984). Resonance 20 is observed as a singlet in a Carr-Purcell spectrum (not shown) and is tentatively assigned to His-24, while resonance 13 may be from His-82.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the 13C NMR studies of horse MbmCN indicate a pK value of 5.3 for either the proximal or the distal histidine (Wilbur & Allerhand, 1977) while 13CO NMR studies of sperm whale and horse MbnCO show an apparent pK between 5 and 6 for the 13CO NMR shifts (Moon et al, 1977). Proton NMR studies of sperm whale Mbn02 indicate distal histidine protonation with a pK of 5.7 (Ohms et al, 1979) while for MbnCO the value is reported to be 5.2 ± 0.2 (Bradbury et al, 1979). The results of temperaturejump measurements on sperm whale Mbm-imidazole (Goldsack et al, 1966) and absorption measurements on MbnCO (Hayashi et al, 1976) also suggest that the distal histidine hydrogen bonds to the sixth ligand with a pK of about 5.7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, several analytical techniques have been developed for determination of PSA and Myo individually. These include chromatography [8,9], mass spectroscopy [10,11], fluorescence spectroscopy [12,13], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [14,15], white light reflectance spectroscopy [16,17], capillary electrophoresis [18], chemiluminescence [19], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [20,21], electrochemiluminescence [22,23], radioimmunoassay [24,25], time-resolved immunofluorometric assay [26], surface plasmon fluorescence immunoassay [27], bioluminescent immunoassay [28], electrochemical [29], surface-enhanced Raman scattering [24,30] and microcantilever method [31]. Of these methods, biosensors especially electrochemical types can offer some advantages in contrast to the commonly used sensing tools, including simultaneous analysis of biomarkers, capability of miniaturization, lower cost and simplicity of analysis [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%