2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histogram of distances for local surface description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tuned parameters of each detector (Table 1) and descriptor ( Table 2) were used to maximize performance. The un-tuned parameters were fixed either to those proposed by the original authors or to their PCL implementation [6,38,50]. For the tuning process, we used the Oakland dataset and confirmed that SHOT has a stable description performance regardless of the description radius, whereas TriSI, FPFH and RoPS gain peak performance and then drop [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tuned parameters of each detector (Table 1) and descriptor ( Table 2) were used to maximize performance. The un-tuned parameters were fixed either to those proposed by the original authors or to their PCL implementation [6,38,50]. For the tuning process, we used the Oakland dataset and confirmed that SHOT has a stable description performance regardless of the description radius, whereas TriSI, FPFH and RoPS gain peak performance and then drop [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During trials we challenge B-HoD against current 3D pattern recognition algorithms presented in Table I. Specifically, we compare and contrast B-HoD with RoPS [6], SHOT [24], FPFH [10], 3DSC [8], USC [27], HoD [14], a binary version of HOD exploiting the quantization pipeline of [13] in combination with the subsampling of the currently proposed B-HoD descriptor. For better readability, this variant of HoD is notated as HoD (*) throughout this paper.…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although current 3D descriptors are a few and perform well [3]- [14], their computational and memory requirements may exceed the capabilities of a lightweight platform. A solution meeting those requirements can be exploiting a binary descriptor instead of a floating point as this allows a faster feature matching process along with a smaller descriptor footprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indicatively, features (data) extracted from the 3D domain are less affected by illumination variation and target pose changes [1] and describe the underlying structure of an object. With respect to future LIDAR based missiles, 3D ATR can improve weapon effectiveness against camouflage, concealment and deception techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%