Pulmonary hypertension is diagnosed by an elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) during resting right heart catheterisation (RHC) [1]. Although "exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension" is no longer a distinct clinical entity, recently, there has been renewed interest in the prognostic value of pulmonary haemodynamic responses to exercise, particularly in patients with fibrotic lung disease [1-4]. As the optimal use of exercise RHC in this cohort remains unknown, our main objective in this study was to study the relationship between exercise haemodynamics and outcomes in fibrotic lung disease patients [3-7]. All consecutive fibrotic lung disease patients undergoing exercise RHC testing at our centre over a 7-year period, regardless of the mPAP at rest, were included in the study. Fibrotic lung disease, scored by one observer (A. Jose) using the method of GOH et al. [8], was defined as >10% fibrosis on computed tomographic imaging at the time of exercise RHC. Subjects without fibrotic lung disease, those with missing data and those with an elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) at rest (>15 mmHg) were excluded. Measurements at rest included heart rate, right atrial pressure (RAP), mPAP, digital mean PAWP, thermodilution cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation. Pressures were measured as the digital mean across several respiratory cycles. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated in the standard fashion. After baseline haemodynamic measurements, the patients underwent supine bicycle ergometer exercise to (subjective) maximal exertion and haemodynamic measurements were repeated. The total pulmonary resistance was calculated both at rest (TPR=mPAP/CO) and at peak exercise (TPRex). The exercise-induced TPR (ΔTPRex=ΔmPAP/ΔCO) was calculated from the difference between rest and peak exercise haemodynamics [1, 3, 5-7]. An abnormal precapillary ΔTPRex, reflecting pulmonary arterial response to exercise, was defined as ΔTPRex ⩾3 mmHg•L −1 •min −1 with concomitant PAWP <20 mmHg at peak exercise. This cutoff was used to definitively exclude patients with occult left heart disease [1, 7]. Demographic, laboratory, functional testing (including 6-min walk test (6MWT)) and pulmonary function testing (PFT) were collected within 3 months of the index exercise RHC. The primary outcome was defined as the first of three clinical worsening events: hospitalisation for cardiopulmonary decompensation, lung transplantation or death. Information on the primary outcome was obtained from the medical record and review of patient's charts. Time zero was the date of the index RHC, and patients were followed until either an event occurred or the study period ended. Patients lost to follow-up were censored at the time of their last clinical encounter. This study was reviewed and approved by the Inova Institutional Review Board (IRB 15-2025). Differences in clinical and haemodynamic characteristics between groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and the Chi-squar...