Histological Typing of Salivary Gland Tumours 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-84506-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological Classification of Salivary Gland Tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
189
1
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
189
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Histologically, the present case showed the features reported in the literature [4,7,8], differing in terms of the presence of intense nuclear and cellular pleomorphism, numerous mitoses, some of them atypical, nuclear hyperchromatism, and numerous prominent nucleoli. Some of these features have also been observed in a case of PC located in the tongue [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Histologically, the present case showed the features reported in the literature [4,7,8], differing in terms of the presence of intense nuclear and cellular pleomorphism, numerous mitoses, some of them atypical, nuclear hyperchromatism, and numerous prominent nucleoli. Some of these features have also been observed in a case of PC located in the tongue [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…3) shows a tumor very similar to CATMSG. Interestingly, Figure 55 of the 2nd edition of the WHO classification of salivary gland neoplasms issued in 1991 [17] illustrates, under the heading of PLGA, a tumor quite similar to those in our paper, which perhaps represents another example of CATMSG. Two other possible candidates for CATMSG were published under different names, and both carcinomas metastasized to the cervical lymph nodes.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Large cell carcinomas also appear to include examples of poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinomas NOS, [35,36]. Some of this confusion can be traced back to the inclusion of large cell carcinomas and small cell carcinomas as part of the spectrum of ''undifferentiated carcinoma'' [21,35] when rigidly applying the 1991 WHO classification of salivary gland tumors [37].…”
Section: The 2005 World Health Organization (Who)mentioning
confidence: 99%