2020
DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1754382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological comparison of Platelet rich fibrin clots prepared by fixed-angle versus horizontal centrifugation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
46
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2018, we developed a novel method that directly determines platelet counts via digestion using tissue plasminogen activator and demonstrated its validity and accuracy in comparison with those of the subtraction method [ 3 ]. To date, micrographic examination methods using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and immunohistochemical techniques have been the only practical options for evaluating platelet distribution [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. However, the data obtained using these methods are often too fragmented to adequately evaluate platelet distribution in three-dimensional (3D) structures by reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, we developed a novel method that directly determines platelet counts via digestion using tissue plasminogen activator and demonstrated its validity and accuracy in comparison with those of the subtraction method [ 3 ]. To date, micrographic examination methods using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and immunohistochemical techniques have been the only practical options for evaluating platelet distribution [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. However, the data obtained using these methods are often too fragmented to adequately evaluate platelet distribution in three-dimensional (3D) structures by reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the preparation of solid PRF is simple, as it basically requires the spontaneous coagulation of centrifuged blood, the protocols have been refined towards gaining an ideal ratio of the PRF clot and its content of platelets, leucocytes, and consequently also growth factors. However, apart from swing-out rotors causing a superior separation of the phases than fixed angle rotors [ 4 ], it is the clotting time, the g-force and the centrifugation time that define the properties of the PRF, also reflected by the various acronyms, including leukocyte-rich L-PRF and advanced A-PRF [ 5 ], most of which are, however, linked to a certain brand of blood collection tubes and centrifuges [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that in L-PRF, platelets and leucocytes are restricted to the buffy coat, A-PRF (200 g) protocols showed a rather equal distribution of platelets in the PRF [ 10 , 11 ]. More recently, PRF protocols prepared via horizontal centrifugation using plain glass tubes without clot activators to prepare H-PRF have been shown to lead to more favorable accumulation of platelets and leukocytes in the upper plasma layers [ 4 , 12 ]. Nevertheless, L-PRF and H-PRF membranes undergo spontaneous fibrinolysis within a 3 week period upon subcutaneous implantation in immunocompromised rodents [ 13 ], and thus are not ideal for clinical application requiring long-term volume stability serving as dermal fillers [ 14 , 15 ] or as a replacement for soft tissue grafts in dentistry [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Centrifugation protocols were originally refined with the goal of an equal distribution and accumulation of platelets within the platelet-poor plasma and the buffy coat layer moving from the original L-PRF protocol (700 g , 12 min) towards a slower A-PRF protocol (210 g , 8–12 min) in fixed-angle centrifuges [ 9 ]. Recently, horizontal centrifugation was introduced, allowing a faster and sharper separation of the cells according to their density in H-PRF [ 13 ]. The impact of gravitation force ( g -force) and time on the gradient of platelets and leucocytes in the tubes was measured in anticoagulated blood [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%