2020
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological Endpoints for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Trials: Lights and Shadows

Abstract: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with liver fibrosis is an increasingly important cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. A diagnosis of NASH can only be made using liver biopsy. Liver histology also forms the endpoint for the expedited licensing strategies that have been approved by regulators to allow patients with NASH access to treatment before the impact of these on clinical outcomes is known. Validation of these histological surrogate endpoints is critical for the ongoing development of new th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although NASH is defined histologically, liver biopsy poses various challenges impacting patient enrollment, observers’ agreement, and extension to the clinical practice of trial findings [ 172 ]. Moreover, the intrinsic imprecision of liver biopsy makes currently adopted histological endpoints in NASH clinical trials both fallacious and overambitious and strongly advises in favor of identifying noninvasive biomarkers and criteria for entry into NASH trials and evaluating drug efficacy [ 34 ].…”
Section: Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NASH is defined histologically, liver biopsy poses various challenges impacting patient enrollment, observers’ agreement, and extension to the clinical practice of trial findings [ 172 ]. Moreover, the intrinsic imprecision of liver biopsy makes currently adopted histological endpoints in NASH clinical trials both fallacious and overambitious and strongly advises in favor of identifying noninvasive biomarkers and criteria for entry into NASH trials and evaluating drug efficacy [ 34 ].…”
Section: Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%